A Comparison of Concatenated Polar Codes with Different Interleaving and Decoding Schemes

Quanyv Wang, Panpan Fu, Shouzhen Zhang
{"title":"A Comparison of Concatenated Polar Codes with Different Interleaving and Decoding Schemes","authors":"Quanyv Wang, Panpan Fu, Shouzhen Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICCCS49078.2020.9118473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Towards the 5th generation wireless systems (5G) and beyond, polar codes have become a hot research topic in the field of communications. In our work, concatenated polar codes with different interleaving and decoding schemes are designed to improve the error performance of finite-length polar codes. In this paper, concatenated polar codes with outer BCH codes are first constructed, besides, concatenated LDPC codes and concatenated Turbo codes are also designed for comparison. At the same time, random interleaving (RI) scheme and blind interleaving (BI) scheme are proposed to construct the concatenated codes. From the simulation results of this paper, we can see that the bit error rate (BER) performance of concatenated codes using BI scheme is better than that of concatenated codes using RI scheme. Furthermore, the BER performance of concatenated polar codes outperforms that of concatenated LDPC codes, but not as good as that of concatenated Turbo codes. To improve the BER performance of concatenated polar codes, we adopt the CRC Aided Successive Cancellation List (CA-SCL) decoding scheme instead of the Successive Cancellation (SC) decoding scheme for inner polar decoding. The results of our study indicate that the BER performance of concatenated polar codes with CA-SCL outperforms that of concatenated polar codes with SC. In addition to this, with the same CRC code length, increasing the list size can improve the decoding performance of CA-SCL. However, there is also a bad side: the decoding complexity of CA-SCL increases rapidly as the list size increases. On the other hand, with the same list size, increasing the CRC code length adversely deteriorates the decoding performance of CA-SCL.","PeriodicalId":105556,"journal":{"name":"2020 5th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 5th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCS49078.2020.9118473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Towards the 5th generation wireless systems (5G) and beyond, polar codes have become a hot research topic in the field of communications. In our work, concatenated polar codes with different interleaving and decoding schemes are designed to improve the error performance of finite-length polar codes. In this paper, concatenated polar codes with outer BCH codes are first constructed, besides, concatenated LDPC codes and concatenated Turbo codes are also designed for comparison. At the same time, random interleaving (RI) scheme and blind interleaving (BI) scheme are proposed to construct the concatenated codes. From the simulation results of this paper, we can see that the bit error rate (BER) performance of concatenated codes using BI scheme is better than that of concatenated codes using RI scheme. Furthermore, the BER performance of concatenated polar codes outperforms that of concatenated LDPC codes, but not as good as that of concatenated Turbo codes. To improve the BER performance of concatenated polar codes, we adopt the CRC Aided Successive Cancellation List (CA-SCL) decoding scheme instead of the Successive Cancellation (SC) decoding scheme for inner polar decoding. The results of our study indicate that the BER performance of concatenated polar codes with CA-SCL outperforms that of concatenated polar codes with SC. In addition to this, with the same CRC code length, increasing the list size can improve the decoding performance of CA-SCL. However, there is also a bad side: the decoding complexity of CA-SCL increases rapidly as the list size increases. On the other hand, with the same list size, increasing the CRC code length adversely deteriorates the decoding performance of CA-SCL.
不同交错译码方案的串接极性码比较
面向第5代无线系统(5G)及以后,极码已成为通信领域的研究热点。在我们的工作中,设计了具有不同交错和解码方案的串联极性码,以改善有限长度极性码的错误性能。本文首先构造了带外部BCH码的串接极性码,并设计了串接LDPC码和串接Turbo码进行比较。同时,提出了随机交织(RI)方案和盲交织(BI)方案来构造拼接码。从本文的仿真结果可以看出,采用BI方案的级联码的误码率(BER)性能优于采用RI方案的级联码。此外,极性串接码的误码率性能优于LDPC串接码,但不如Turbo串接码。为了提高串列极化码的误码率,我们采用CRC辅助连续取消列表(CA-SCL)译码方案代替连续取消(SC)译码方案进行内极化译码。我们的研究结果表明,使用CA-SCL串列的极性码的误码率性能优于使用SC串列的极性码。此外,在相同CRC码长度的情况下,增加列表大小可以提高CA-SCL的译码性能。然而,也有不好的一面:CA-SCL的解码复杂性随着列表大小的增加而迅速增加。另一方面,在相同列表大小的情况下,增加CRC码长会降低CA-SCL的解码性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信