Lunatics’ rights activism in Britain and the German Empire, 1870–1920

Burkhart Brückner
{"title":"Lunatics’ rights activism in Britain and the German Empire, 1870–1920","authors":"Burkhart Brückner","doi":"10.7765/9781526154897.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participation and empowerment are core issues in contemporary mental health policy. Involving (ex-)users as ‘experts by experience’ has become an internationally accepted guiding principle for civil society health promotion, especially in the wake of the 2006 UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. However, this ‘mainstream user involvement’ also meets with scepticism from user self-advocacy initiatives and organisations. This can, for example, be seen in the words of Diana Rose, a ‘user/survivor academic’ at London’s King’s College, who, while criticising the austerity policy in the British healthcare system, emphasises the significance of local, ‘hidden’ and often radical grassroots groups:","PeriodicalId":438555,"journal":{"name":"Patient voices in Britain, 1840–1948","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient voices in Britain, 1840–1948","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526154897.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participation and empowerment are core issues in contemporary mental health policy. Involving (ex-)users as ‘experts by experience’ has become an internationally accepted guiding principle for civil society health promotion, especially in the wake of the 2006 UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. However, this ‘mainstream user involvement’ also meets with scepticism from user self-advocacy initiatives and organisations. This can, for example, be seen in the words of Diana Rose, a ‘user/survivor academic’ at London’s King’s College, who, while criticising the austerity policy in the British healthcare system, emphasises the significance of local, ‘hidden’ and often radical grassroots groups:
1870-1920年,英国和德意志帝国的疯子权利运动
参与和赋权是当代精神卫生政策的核心问题。特别是在2006年《联合国残疾人权利公约》之后,让(前)吸毒者作为“经验专家”参与进来已成为民间社会促进健康的一项国际公认的指导原则。然而,这种“主流用户参与”也遭到了用户自我倡导倡议和组织的质疑。例如,伦敦国王学院的“使用者/幸存者学者”戴安娜·罗斯(Diana Rose)的话可以看出这一点,她在批评英国医疗保健系统中的紧缩政策时,强调了地方的、“隐藏的”、往往是激进的基层团体的重要性:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信