Eliciting contextual requirements at design time: A case study

Alessia Knauss, D. Damian, K. Schneider
{"title":"Eliciting contextual requirements at design time: A case study","authors":"Alessia Knauss, D. Damian, K. Schneider","doi":"10.1109/EmpiRE.2014.6890117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need to consider context in order to understand requirements is established in requirements engineering. Recently, this has been discussed more intensively for sociotechnical systems, which offer a rich spectrum of different operating contexts. Contextual requirements proved valuable to model requirements together with the context they are valid in, but there is a lack of research on how to derive them from stakeholder needs. Our goal in this paper is to explore the usefulness of existing requirements elicitation techniques for the identification of contextual requirements early, i.e. at design time. In a case study we investigate end-user viewpoints, together with interviews, scenarios, prototyping, goal-based analysis, and groupwork as a means to elicit and clarify contextual requirements already at design time. In our case study a certain combination of the applied requirements elicitation techniques stood out as most beneficial for the identification of contextual requirements. In addition, we discovered valuable indicators of differences in the operative context, for example when end-users cannot agree on refinements of specific requirements. Designers and operators of adaptive systems might benefit by taking such conflicts and resulting contextual requirements into account.","PeriodicalId":259907,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 4th International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 4th International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2014.6890117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The need to consider context in order to understand requirements is established in requirements engineering. Recently, this has been discussed more intensively for sociotechnical systems, which offer a rich spectrum of different operating contexts. Contextual requirements proved valuable to model requirements together with the context they are valid in, but there is a lack of research on how to derive them from stakeholder needs. Our goal in this paper is to explore the usefulness of existing requirements elicitation techniques for the identification of contextual requirements early, i.e. at design time. In a case study we investigate end-user viewpoints, together with interviews, scenarios, prototyping, goal-based analysis, and groupwork as a means to elicit and clarify contextual requirements already at design time. In our case study a certain combination of the applied requirements elicitation techniques stood out as most beneficial for the identification of contextual requirements. In addition, we discovered valuable indicators of differences in the operative context, for example when end-users cannot agree on refinements of specific requirements. Designers and operators of adaptive systems might benefit by taking such conflicts and resulting contextual requirements into account.
在设计时引出上下文需求:一个案例研究
为了理解需求而考虑上下文的需求是在需求工程中建立起来的。最近,这在社会技术系统中得到了更深入的讨论,它提供了丰富的不同操作环境。上下文需求被证明对与它们有效的上下文一起建模的需求是有价值的,但是缺乏关于如何从涉众需求中导出它们的研究。我们在本文中的目标是探索现有需求引出技术在早期识别上下文需求方面的有用性,即在设计阶段。在案例研究中,我们调查最终用户的观点,结合访谈、场景、原型设计、基于目标的分析和小组工作,作为在设计时引出和澄清上下文需求的一种手段。在我们的案例研究中,应用需求引出技术的特定组合对于上下文需求的识别是最有益的。此外,我们还发现了在执行方面存在差异的有价值的指标,例如当最终用户不能就具体要求的改进达成一致意见时。适应性系统的设计者和操作者可以通过考虑这些冲突和由此产生的上下文需求而获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信