The State-owned Maritime Concessions in Italy: the Cross-border Interest Issue and the Ongoing Reform of the Sector

A. Monica
{"title":"The State-owned Maritime Concessions in Italy: the Cross-border Interest Issue and the Ongoing Reform of the Sector","authors":"A. Monica","doi":"10.7590/187479822x16589299241745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Italian State-owned maritime concessions regulatory framework testifies the seminal impact of Title IV of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and of the Services Directive (Directive 2006/123/EC) on national administrative procedures. Recently, the Plenary\n Assembly of the Council of State (following the reasoning of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in joined cases C-458/14 and C-67/15 Promoimpresa and Mr. Melis), has confirmed the illegitimacy of the automatic extension of State-owned maritime concessions provided by the Italian\n law until 2033, as contrary to both Article 49 TFEU and Article 12 of the Services Directive. It has modulated the effects of the unlawfulness of the ongoing extension calling on the Italian legislator to reform the sector's regulations by the end of 2023. Therefore, both the legislator and\n the national administrations will have to find a balance between all relevant interests at stake in a transformed service market of bath tourism, since the beginning of the implementation of the Services Directive. Moreover, also in a case-by-case analysis of the 'scarcity of available natural\n resources', they both will have to consider the cross-border interest of these concessions as necessarily existing in re ipsa, whilst balancing this aspect with some peculiar features of the Italian bathing sector. Firstly, it is clear how the national legislator has to implement the EU law\n taking into account the concrete facts and context at stake. Secondly, the protection of private operators and of recipients is a basic condition not only for a general equitable and solidarity-based reform, but also for each selection procedure.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"1987 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479822x16589299241745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Italian State-owned maritime concessions regulatory framework testifies the seminal impact of Title IV of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and of the Services Directive (Directive 2006/123/EC) on national administrative procedures. Recently, the Plenary Assembly of the Council of State (following the reasoning of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in joined cases C-458/14 and C-67/15 Promoimpresa and Mr. Melis), has confirmed the illegitimacy of the automatic extension of State-owned maritime concessions provided by the Italian law until 2033, as contrary to both Article 49 TFEU and Article 12 of the Services Directive. It has modulated the effects of the unlawfulness of the ongoing extension calling on the Italian legislator to reform the sector's regulations by the end of 2023. Therefore, both the legislator and the national administrations will have to find a balance between all relevant interests at stake in a transformed service market of bath tourism, since the beginning of the implementation of the Services Directive. Moreover, also in a case-by-case analysis of the 'scarcity of available natural resources', they both will have to consider the cross-border interest of these concessions as necessarily existing in re ipsa, whilst balancing this aspect with some peculiar features of the Italian bathing sector. Firstly, it is clear how the national legislator has to implement the EU law taking into account the concrete facts and context at stake. Secondly, the protection of private operators and of recipients is a basic condition not only for a general equitable and solidarity-based reform, but also for each selection procedure.
意大利国有海上特许权:跨境利益问题和正在进行的部门改革
意大利国有海事特许权监管框架证明了欧盟运作条约(TFEU)第四章和服务指令(指令2006/123/EC)对国家行政程序的开创性影响。最近,国务委员会全体大会(根据欧洲联盟法院(CJEU)在Promoimpresa和Melis先生的C-458/14和C-67/15联合案件中的推理)确认,意大利法律规定的国有海事特许权自动延长至2033年是非法的,这违反了TFEU第49条和服务指令第12条。它已经调整了正在进行的延期的非法性的影响,呼吁意大利立法者在2023年底之前改革该行业的法规。因此,自《服务指令》开始实施以来,立法者和国家行政当局都必须在转变后的浴室旅游服务市场的所有相关利益之间找到平衡。此外,在对“可用自然资源的稀缺性”的个案分析中,他们都必须考虑到这些特许权的跨境利益必然存在于re ipsa中,同时平衡这方面与意大利洗浴部门的一些特殊特征。首先,很明显国家立法者必须考虑到具体的事实和利害关系的背景来实施欧盟法律。第二,保护私营经营者和受助者不仅是一般公平和以团结为基础的改革的基本条件,而且也是每项选择程序的基本条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信