Becomings or fixity?

A. Phoenix
{"title":"Becomings or fixity?","authors":"A. Phoenix","doi":"10.7146/irtp.v1i2.127970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the notion of acceleration as simultaneously dynamic and fast moving but underpinned by legacies from an earlier age that inform their development and the ways in which they inflect social life. It shows how sites of dynamic social acceleration can shift and change its focus over time, while (implicitly) maintaining the same logic of unequal power relations. In order to produce social justice and equality, it is, therefore, necessary to understand the logic and ideologies that underpin social relations and technological developments. The paper starts by illustrating the ways in which social acceleration is both longstanding and constitute ideologies of their time. It then considers the thinking of the UK psychologist Francis Galton, the cousin of Charles Darwin, and the legacy of his work. The third section presents the theoretical resources on which the paper draws. The paper then considers three examples of measurements that reproduce unequal power relations by fixing inequalities in their assumptions, even though they exemplify social acceleration. The three examples are parenting styles, unconscious bias and algorithms. The final main part of the paper considers possibilities for change by briefly historicising statistics and considering how they can be rethought. It also briefly discusses insider resistance to ideological fixity that reproduces and amplifies social inequalities of, for example, racialisation, gender and social class.","PeriodicalId":250827,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Theoretical Psychologies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Theoretical Psychologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v1i2.127970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the notion of acceleration as simultaneously dynamic and fast moving but underpinned by legacies from an earlier age that inform their development and the ways in which they inflect social life. It shows how sites of dynamic social acceleration can shift and change its focus over time, while (implicitly) maintaining the same logic of unequal power relations. In order to produce social justice and equality, it is, therefore, necessary to understand the logic and ideologies that underpin social relations and technological developments. The paper starts by illustrating the ways in which social acceleration is both longstanding and constitute ideologies of their time. It then considers the thinking of the UK psychologist Francis Galton, the cousin of Charles Darwin, and the legacy of his work. The third section presents the theoretical resources on which the paper draws. The paper then considers three examples of measurements that reproduce unequal power relations by fixing inequalities in their assumptions, even though they exemplify social acceleration. The three examples are parenting styles, unconscious bias and algorithms. The final main part of the paper considers possibilities for change by briefly historicising statistics and considering how they can be rethought. It also briefly discusses insider resistance to ideological fixity that reproduces and amplifies social inequalities of, for example, racialisation, gender and social class.
变化还是固定?
本文探讨了加速的概念,即同时动态和快速移动,但以早期的遗产为基础,这些遗产告知了它们的发展以及它们影响社会生活的方式。它展示了动态社会加速的地点如何随着时间的推移而转移和改变其焦点,同时(隐含地)保持不平等权力关系的相同逻辑。因此,为了产生社会正义和平等,有必要了解支撑社会关系和技术发展的逻辑和意识形态。本文首先阐述了社会加速是如何长期存在的,并构成了他们那个时代的意识形态。然后介绍了英国心理学家、查尔斯•达尔文(Charles Darwin)的堂兄弗朗西斯•高尔顿(Francis Galton)的思想,以及他的研究成果。第三部分是本文所借鉴的理论资源。然后,本文考虑了三个测量的例子,它们通过在假设中固定不平等来再现不平等的权力关系,尽管它们是社会加速的例证。这三个例子是养育方式、无意识偏见和算法。论文的最后主要部分通过简要地将统计数据历史化并考虑如何重新思考统计数据来考虑改变的可能性。它还简要讨论了内部人士对意识形态固定性的抵制,这种固定性再现并放大了种族化、性别和社会阶级等社会不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信