STRATIFICATION OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: TO THE PROBLEM OF PHENOTYPES

{"title":"STRATIFICATION OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: TO THE PROBLEM OF PHENOTYPES","authors":"","doi":"10.35465/30.2.2022.pp28-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented review is devoted to the actual problem of knee osteoarthritis (OA) stratification and consists of descriptive and systemic analysis parts. In the first part, the evolution of OA concepts and the development of phenotypic approach is reflected. It is noted that OA followed long path from age-related “wear and tear” to inflammatory disease with high heterogeneity, which triggered enormous number of attempts to group this disease in the last decade. As no unified approach has been proposed in its classifying, rheumatology has collected an abundance of ambiguous data obtained in studies on knee OA. Recent advances in phenotyping made obvious the need to systematize proposed earlier classifications and to evaluate their compliance with the modern concept, which was done in the second part of review. Systematic search strategy was used in the referenced databases MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar without a time frame with the following keywords \"osteoarthritis\", \"phenotypes\", \"classification\", \"subtypes\", \"subsets\", \"subgroups\", \"endotypes\", and 58 different classifications were extracted, analyzed and stratified into the following boxes: phenotypes, endotypes, and other classifications. Among the proposed OA classifications, clinical groups were the most common, followed by structural, laboratory, molecular, genetic, and progression trajectories. Only few of proposed OA kinds can rightly be called phenotypes whereas most of classifications aimed to distinguish predictors or risk factors for this disease. It can be assured that the variety of accumulated information will soon lead us to novel approaches of phenotype-associated management strategy for OA patients.","PeriodicalId":380764,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology (Bulgaria)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology (Bulgaria)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35465/30.2.2022.pp28-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presented review is devoted to the actual problem of knee osteoarthritis (OA) stratification and consists of descriptive and systemic analysis parts. In the first part, the evolution of OA concepts and the development of phenotypic approach is reflected. It is noted that OA followed long path from age-related “wear and tear” to inflammatory disease with high heterogeneity, which triggered enormous number of attempts to group this disease in the last decade. As no unified approach has been proposed in its classifying, rheumatology has collected an abundance of ambiguous data obtained in studies on knee OA. Recent advances in phenotyping made obvious the need to systematize proposed earlier classifications and to evaluate their compliance with the modern concept, which was done in the second part of review. Systematic search strategy was used in the referenced databases MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar without a time frame with the following keywords "osteoarthritis", "phenotypes", "classification", "subtypes", "subsets", "subgroups", "endotypes", and 58 different classifications were extracted, analyzed and stratified into the following boxes: phenotypes, endotypes, and other classifications. Among the proposed OA classifications, clinical groups were the most common, followed by structural, laboratory, molecular, genetic, and progression trajectories. Only few of proposed OA kinds can rightly be called phenotypes whereas most of classifications aimed to distinguish predictors or risk factors for this disease. It can be assured that the variety of accumulated information will soon lead us to novel approaches of phenotype-associated management strategy for OA patients.
膝骨关节炎的分层:对表型的问题
本综述致力于膝骨关节炎(OA)分层的实际问题,包括描述性和系统性分析部分。第一部分回顾了OA概念的演变和表型方法的发展。值得注意的是,骨性关节炎经历了从与年龄相关的“磨损”到具有高度异质性的炎症性疾病的漫长过程,这在过去十年中引发了大量对该疾病进行分组的尝试。由于没有统一的分类方法,风湿病学收集了大量在膝关节OA研究中获得的模糊数据。表型研究的最新进展表明,有必要将早期提出的分类系统化,并评估其与现代概念的一致性,这在综述的第二部分完成。在参考数据库MEDLINE/PubMed和Google Scholar中采用无时间框架的系统检索策略,检索关键词为“osteoarthritis”、“phenotypes”、“classification”、“subtypes”、“subsets”、“subgroups”、“endotypes”,提取58种不同的分类,进行分析,并将其分为以下几类:phenotypes、endotypes和其他分类。在提出的OA分类中,临床组是最常见的,其次是结构、实验室、分子、遗传和进展轨迹。只有少数提出的OA类型可以正确地称为表型,而大多数分类旨在区分这种疾病的预测因素或风险因素。可以肯定的是,积累的各种信息将很快引导我们找到OA患者表型相关管理策略的新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信