Metaphors and evaluation in popular economic discourse on trade wars

Dongman Cai, A. Deignan
{"title":"Metaphors and evaluation in popular economic discourse on trade wars","authors":"Dongman Cai, A. Deignan","doi":"10.1515/9783110629460-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphor is used for different functions, including supporting the development of new knowledge and theory, communicating this, and persuading or framing its topic. All of these functions have been noted in economics texts. Analyses of popular economics texts have found that the same metaphor vehicles can be exploited in different ways to present different evaluations of their topic. For instance, both the Eurosceptic British press, and the Europhile Italian press framed the introduction of the Euro using a BIRTH metaphor, but used it very differently to convey their views (Semino 2002). We study the metaphors used to write about Sino-EU trade disputes in two popular newspapers, from China and the UK, in two corpora of approximately a third of a million tokens each. We find that similar metaphor groupings are used, notably FIGHT/ WAR, but with differing frequencies and in different ways. The Chinese texts used FIGHT/ WAR metaphors to write about protectionism, which tended to be personified and was rarely associated with a specific country. The UK texts used similar metaphors about free trade, which was characterised as the victim of assaults and in need of defending. As well as these qualitative findings, we found the quantitative data suggestive, though larger corpora would be needed for robust statistical conclusions.","PeriodicalId":200484,"journal":{"name":"Current Approaches to Metaphor Analysis in Discourse","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Approaches to Metaphor Analysis in Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629460-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Metaphor is used for different functions, including supporting the development of new knowledge and theory, communicating this, and persuading or framing its topic. All of these functions have been noted in economics texts. Analyses of popular economics texts have found that the same metaphor vehicles can be exploited in different ways to present different evaluations of their topic. For instance, both the Eurosceptic British press, and the Europhile Italian press framed the introduction of the Euro using a BIRTH metaphor, but used it very differently to convey their views (Semino 2002). We study the metaphors used to write about Sino-EU trade disputes in two popular newspapers, from China and the UK, in two corpora of approximately a third of a million tokens each. We find that similar metaphor groupings are used, notably FIGHT/ WAR, but with differing frequencies and in different ways. The Chinese texts used FIGHT/ WAR metaphors to write about protectionism, which tended to be personified and was rarely associated with a specific country. The UK texts used similar metaphors about free trade, which was characterised as the victim of assaults and in need of defending. As well as these qualitative findings, we found the quantitative data suggestive, though larger corpora would be needed for robust statistical conclusions.
关于贸易战的通俗经济话语中的隐喻与评价
隐喻有不同的功能,包括支持新知识和理论的发展,沟通新知识和理论,说服或构建其主题。所有这些功能在经济学教科书中都有提及。对流行经济学文本的分析发现,相同的隐喻载体可以以不同的方式被利用来表达对其主题的不同评价。例如,疑欧派的英国媒体和亲欧派的意大利媒体都使用了“诞生”这个比喻来描述欧元的引入,但表达观点的方式却截然不同(Semino 2002)。我们研究了在中国和英国两家流行的报纸上报道中欧贸易争端时使用的隐喻,两种语料库各有大约三分之一万个代币。我们发现使用了类似的隐喻分组,特别是战斗/战争,但频率和方式不同。中文文本用“打仗”或“打仗”的比喻来描写保护主义,往往是人格化的,很少与特定的国家联系在一起。英国的教科书对自由贸易也使用了类似的隐喻,将其描述为攻击的受害者,需要捍卫。除了这些定性发现外,我们还发现定量数据具有启发性,尽管需要更大的语料库才能得出可靠的统计结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信