Consideration of information that occupational physicians should obtain from employers for use in providing employees’ healthcare

Rina Minohara, Yuichi Kobayashi, Hitomi Fujise, Suo Taira, Kota Fukai, Haruna Hirosato, K. Mori
{"title":"Consideration of information that occupational physicians should obtain from employers for use in providing employees’ healthcare","authors":"Rina Minohara, Yuichi Kobayashi, Hitomi Fujise, Suo Taira, Kota Fukai, Haruna Hirosato, K. Mori","doi":"10.1539/EOHP.2020-0026-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In Japan, as a result of legislation, the role of occupational physicians and the function of occupational health have been strengthened. Employers are now required to provide information to occupational physicians. This study explored what information occupational physicians considered should be available to them. Methods: We conducted a focus group discussion with eight professional occupational physicians and developed a draft list of the information that occupational physicians should obtain from employers. To assess the validity of the list, we conducted a questionnaire survey of 777 occupational physicians in the training and certification system of the Japan Society of Occupational Health. Results: We obtained valid responses from 155 occupational physicians. In total, over 80% agreed or somewhat agreed that all 24 categories were required, indicating that a consensus had been reached. In two of the eight categories for which fewer than 80% responded “agree”, more senior or special-ized physicians were significantly more likely to respond “agree” than others. Conclusion: The results of the survey suggest specific experiences and systematic education influence decisions about whether certain types of information are considered necessary. Finally, based on the opinions in the open-ended section of the questionnaire, we recommend a list with 26 categories of information collecting from an employer. We believe the key to sharing information is to have a common understanding with employers and develop a good relationship so that additional information will be disclosed voluntarily. Occupational physicians need to be mindful of this need to develop rela-tionships with employers.","PeriodicalId":278195,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Occupational Health Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/EOHP.2020-0026-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In Japan, as a result of legislation, the role of occupational physicians and the function of occupational health have been strengthened. Employers are now required to provide information to occupational physicians. This study explored what information occupational physicians considered should be available to them. Methods: We conducted a focus group discussion with eight professional occupational physicians and developed a draft list of the information that occupational physicians should obtain from employers. To assess the validity of the list, we conducted a questionnaire survey of 777 occupational physicians in the training and certification system of the Japan Society of Occupational Health. Results: We obtained valid responses from 155 occupational physicians. In total, over 80% agreed or somewhat agreed that all 24 categories were required, indicating that a consensus had been reached. In two of the eight categories for which fewer than 80% responded “agree”, more senior or special-ized physicians were significantly more likely to respond “agree” than others. Conclusion: The results of the survey suggest specific experiences and systematic education influence decisions about whether certain types of information are considered necessary. Finally, based on the opinions in the open-ended section of the questionnaire, we recommend a list with 26 categories of information collecting from an employer. We believe the key to sharing information is to have a common understanding with employers and develop a good relationship so that additional information will be disclosed voluntarily. Occupational physicians need to be mindful of this need to develop rela-tionships with employers.
考虑职业医生应从雇主处获得的信息,以便为雇员提供医疗保健
目标:在日本,由于立法,职业医生的作用和职业保健的职能得到了加强。雇主现在被要求向职业医生提供信息。本研究探讨了职业医生认为应该向他们提供哪些信息。方法:对8名职业医师进行焦点小组讨论,制定职业医师应向用人单位获取的信息清单草案。为了评估该清单的有效性,我们对日本职业卫生学会培训认证系统的777名职业医生进行了问卷调查。结果:获得了155名职业医师的有效反馈。总的来说,超过80%的人同意或多少同意所有24个类别都是必需的,这表明已经达成了协商一致意见。在回答“同意”的少于80%的8个类别中的两个类别中,更资深或更专业的医生明显比其他人更有可能回答“同意”。结论:调查结果表明,具体的经验和系统的教育影响决定是否认为某些类型的信息是必要的。最后,根据问卷开放式部分的意见,我们推荐了一个包含26类雇主信息收集的列表。我们认为,信息共享的关键是与雇主达成共识,并建立良好的关系,以便自愿披露额外的信息。职业医生需要注意与雇主发展关系的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信