Effect of Human Agent Interaction Improves Self-Esteem and Students' Motivation

Ellina Rienovita, M. Taniguchi, M. Kawahara, Yugo Hayashi, Yugo Takeuchi
{"title":"Effect of Human Agent Interaction Improves Self-Esteem and Students' Motivation","authors":"Ellina Rienovita, M. Taniguchi, M. Kawahara, Yugo Hayashi, Yugo Takeuchi","doi":"10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2017.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study had two objectives: (1) to investigate the influence of self-esteem and to increase students accomplishments on changes in self-efficacy to encourage students by programming skills and (2) to establish a peerlearning environment via an agent-mediated interaction in order to motivate students to teach other using both the blackboard system (BBS) and the computer-mediated environment (CME). The BBS is an agent-mediated interaction unidentified which will answer the questions. When the student ignores the questions and therefore he/she hesitates to answer, then question-answer (QA) agent does not get a reward from others. However, CME is an agent-mediated interaction can identify who will answer the questions. Agent-mediated interaction (AMI) enforcement to help answer the student question and given the reward. The being reason that QA agent may help the student in answering the questions and continuously teaching others. Experimental results show that the difference between interaction among learners using CME and BBS is significant. Help and reward can encourage self-esteem and self-efficacy. Notably, students may reflect negatively on their self-efficacy after successfully completing an assignment, or positively after struggling with an assignment. Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) appropriately in the way that facilitates learning and motivation in peerlearning environments.","PeriodicalId":281712,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2017.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The study had two objectives: (1) to investigate the influence of self-esteem and to increase students accomplishments on changes in self-efficacy to encourage students by programming skills and (2) to establish a peerlearning environment via an agent-mediated interaction in order to motivate students to teach other using both the blackboard system (BBS) and the computer-mediated environment (CME). The BBS is an agent-mediated interaction unidentified which will answer the questions. When the student ignores the questions and therefore he/she hesitates to answer, then question-answer (QA) agent does not get a reward from others. However, CME is an agent-mediated interaction can identify who will answer the questions. Agent-mediated interaction (AMI) enforcement to help answer the student question and given the reward. The being reason that QA agent may help the student in answering the questions and continuously teaching others. Experimental results show that the difference between interaction among learners using CME and BBS is significant. Help and reward can encourage self-esteem and self-efficacy. Notably, students may reflect negatively on their self-efficacy after successfully completing an assignment, or positively after struggling with an assignment. Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) appropriately in the way that facilitates learning and motivation in peerlearning environments.
人- Agent互动对学生自尊和学习动机的影响
本研究有两个目的:(1)探讨自尊对自我效能感变化的影响,并提高学生的成就,以鼓励学生通过编程技能;(2)通过代理人中介的互动建立同伴学习环境,以激励学生同时使用黑板系统(BBS)和计算机中介环境(CME)进行教学。BBS是一种未知的代理中介交互,它将回答问题。当学生忽略问题,因此他/她犹豫回答,那么问答(QA)代理没有得到别人的奖励。然而,CME是一种代理介导的互动,可以确定谁将回答问题。代理中介交互(AMI)强制帮助回答学生的问题并给予奖励。QA代理可以帮助学生回答问题,并不断地教别人的原因。实验结果表明,使用CME和BBS的学习者之间的互动存在显著差异。帮助和奖励可以鼓励自尊和自我效能。值得注意的是,学生在成功完成作业后可能会对自我效能感产生负面影响,而在努力完成作业后则会产生积极影响。在对等学习环境中适当地促进学习和动机的人-代理交互(HAI)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信