{"title":"Service Learning: A Reform Initiative for Middle Level Curriculum.","authors":"Warren C. Hope","doi":"10.1080/00098659909599400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he current reform movement in education began in the 1980s and continues unabated. Comprehensive in scope, affecting all levels of schooling, it has been a singular fixation for educators, parents, and others interested in the quality of students' experiences in schools. Surprisingly, the reform process and the multitude of reports, recommendations, and legislation generated by individuals, commissions, and legislatures have not been translated into actual teaching practices. That is particularly true for middle schools, where a conspicuous gap exists between the existing research and recommendations about the intellectual and emotional needs of young adolescents and the current organization and curriculum of middle schools (Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development 1989). Nevertheless, the reform bandwagon rolls on, and the public continues to castigate our education system for its shortcomings. Overlooked is the basic understanding that for reform to be successful, it must begin with the process of how teachers teach and how students learn (Brooks and Brooks 1993). Central to the process in middle school are informed teachers who understand adolescents and are willing to devote energy and time to their growth and development. Middle school teachers must realize that the curriculum needs to be","PeriodicalId":339545,"journal":{"name":"The Clearing House","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clearing House","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659909599400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
he current reform movement in education began in the 1980s and continues unabated. Comprehensive in scope, affecting all levels of schooling, it has been a singular fixation for educators, parents, and others interested in the quality of students' experiences in schools. Surprisingly, the reform process and the multitude of reports, recommendations, and legislation generated by individuals, commissions, and legislatures have not been translated into actual teaching practices. That is particularly true for middle schools, where a conspicuous gap exists between the existing research and recommendations about the intellectual and emotional needs of young adolescents and the current organization and curriculum of middle schools (Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development 1989). Nevertheless, the reform bandwagon rolls on, and the public continues to castigate our education system for its shortcomings. Overlooked is the basic understanding that for reform to be successful, it must begin with the process of how teachers teach and how students learn (Brooks and Brooks 1993). Central to the process in middle school are informed teachers who understand adolescents and are willing to devote energy and time to their growth and development. Middle school teachers must realize that the curriculum needs to be
当前的教育改革运动始于20世纪80年代,并一直有增无减。它涉及面广,影响到各级学校教育,一直是教育工作者、家长和其他对学生在校经历质量感兴趣的人关注的焦点。令人惊讶的是,改革进程以及由个人、委员会和立法机构提出的大量报告、建议和立法并没有转化为实际的教学实践。对于中学来说尤其如此,在那里,关于青少年智力和情感需求的现有研究和建议与中学目前的组织和课程之间存在着明显的差距(卡内基青少年发展委员会,1989年)。然而,改革的潮流仍在继续,公众继续批评我们的教育制度的缺点。人们忽略了一个基本的认识,即改革要取得成功,必须从教师如何教学和学生如何学习的过程开始(Brooks and Brooks 1993)。中学过程的核心是了解青少年并愿意为他们的成长和发展投入精力和时间的知情教师。中学教师必须认识到,课程必须是