Improved method for ALT plan optimization

P. Arrowsmith
{"title":"Improved method for ALT plan optimization","authors":"P. Arrowsmith","doi":"10.1109/RAM.2017.7889730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Candidate test plans with 3 stress levels (L, M, H) were identified using the probability of zero failures at one or more stress levels Pr{ZFP1} as a target parameter. For a given sample size n, the allocations nL and nM are input variables. The optimization involves finding a minimum for the lower stress level, on the premise that plans with wider spread of the stress levels have smaller error of the time-to-failure (TTF) extrapolated to the use stress condition. The only constraint is equal spacing of the stress levels, in terms of the standardized stress (ξ). The proposed method does not require computation of the large sample approximate variance (Avar). The optimization can be conveniently done using a spreadsheet and is quite flexible, enabling different censor times to be used for each stress level and can be readily extended to 4 or more stress levels. Monte Carlo simulation of the candidate test plans was used to verify the assumption that the variance of the extrapolated TTF is proportional to the lower stress ξL, for a given allocation. The optimized test plans and variance of the estimated time to 10% failure are similar to those previously published, using the same planning values. Although the optimization method identifies acceptable candidate test plans, there may be other allocations (with slightly higher ξL) that give lower variance of the estimated TTF. However, the difference is typically within the resolution of the stress factor (e.g. ∆T <1 °C) and the uncertainty of the estimated parameter. Monte Carlo simulation can be used to fine tune candidate test plans found by the optimization method.","PeriodicalId":138871,"journal":{"name":"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAM.2017.7889730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Candidate test plans with 3 stress levels (L, M, H) were identified using the probability of zero failures at one or more stress levels Pr{ZFP1} as a target parameter. For a given sample size n, the allocations nL and nM are input variables. The optimization involves finding a minimum for the lower stress level, on the premise that plans with wider spread of the stress levels have smaller error of the time-to-failure (TTF) extrapolated to the use stress condition. The only constraint is equal spacing of the stress levels, in terms of the standardized stress (ξ). The proposed method does not require computation of the large sample approximate variance (Avar). The optimization can be conveniently done using a spreadsheet and is quite flexible, enabling different censor times to be used for each stress level and can be readily extended to 4 or more stress levels. Monte Carlo simulation of the candidate test plans was used to verify the assumption that the variance of the extrapolated TTF is proportional to the lower stress ξL, for a given allocation. The optimized test plans and variance of the estimated time to 10% failure are similar to those previously published, using the same planning values. Although the optimization method identifies acceptable candidate test plans, there may be other allocations (with slightly higher ξL) that give lower variance of the estimated TTF. However, the difference is typically within the resolution of the stress factor (e.g. ∆T <1 °C) and the uncertainty of the estimated parameter. Monte Carlo simulation can be used to fine tune candidate test plans found by the optimization method.
ALT计划优化的改进方法
以一个或多个应力水平Pr{ZFP1}为目标参数,确定具有3个应力水平(L、M、H)的候选测试计划。对于给定的样本量n,分配nL和nM是输入变量。优化包括寻找较低应力水平的最小值,前提是应力水平分布较广的方案外推到使用应力条件的失效时间(TTF)误差较小。唯一的约束是应力水平的间距相等,以标准化应力(ξ)表示。该方法不需要计算大样本近似方差(Avar)。优化可以使用电子表格方便地完成,并且非常灵活,可以为每个压力水平使用不同的审查时间,并且可以很容易地扩展到4个或更多的压力水平。对候选测试计划进行蒙特卡罗模拟,以验证外推TTF的方差与给定分配的较低应力ξL成正比的假设。使用相同的计划值,优化的测试计划和估计时间到10%失败的方差与先前发布的相似。尽管优化方法确定了可接受的候选测试计划,但可能存在其他分配(具有略高的ξL),其给出的估计TTF方差较低。然而,差异通常在应力因子的分辨率(例如∆T <1°C)和估计参数的不确定性范围内。蒙特卡罗模拟可以对优化方法找到的候选测试方案进行微调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信