Making sustainable markets and the forming of a circular economy

K. Mason, Thomas Jalili Tanha
{"title":"Making sustainable markets and the forming of a circular economy","authors":"K. Mason, Thomas Jalili Tanha","doi":"10.4324/9780429346347-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter we explore what it means to conceptualise and create sustainable markets and the implications of the making of sustainable markets for the Circular Economy. In so doing, we consider extant market studies research that seeks to explain how collectives are mobilised into generating new conceptualisations of concerned markets (Fernandes, Mason and Chakrabarti 2019; Geiger et al. 2014; Mason, Friesl and Ford 2017), where market action needs to be changed to make a market work well for society and for the environment (Geels 2010). We also draw on the notion of moral markets. That is, how markets that adopt certain forms of market action become understood as valuable in their own right. We see this as central to understanding how circular economies are created. We see moral markets as being revealing something of the value of anarchistic actions, of concerned entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs that aim to bring about such change. ways – to generate new and more holistic forms of knowing and acting. Three specific forms of marketization work are identified: 1) the conceptualisation of actors' roles, 2) the conceptualisations of markets, and, 3) the conceptualisation of goods. These findings show the strategic net as a well-positioned and well-equipped institutional form for engaging in marketization, and more specifically a particular form of marketization work, that Mason, Friesl and Ford (2017) label conceptualisation work .","PeriodicalId":247451,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Waste, Resources and the Circular Economy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Waste, Resources and the Circular Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346347-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter we explore what it means to conceptualise and create sustainable markets and the implications of the making of sustainable markets for the Circular Economy. In so doing, we consider extant market studies research that seeks to explain how collectives are mobilised into generating new conceptualisations of concerned markets (Fernandes, Mason and Chakrabarti 2019; Geiger et al. 2014; Mason, Friesl and Ford 2017), where market action needs to be changed to make a market work well for society and for the environment (Geels 2010). We also draw on the notion of moral markets. That is, how markets that adopt certain forms of market action become understood as valuable in their own right. We see this as central to understanding how circular economies are created. We see moral markets as being revealing something of the value of anarchistic actions, of concerned entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs that aim to bring about such change. ways – to generate new and more holistic forms of knowing and acting. Three specific forms of marketization work are identified: 1) the conceptualisation of actors' roles, 2) the conceptualisations of markets, and, 3) the conceptualisation of goods. These findings show the strategic net as a well-positioned and well-equipped institutional form for engaging in marketization, and more specifically a particular form of marketization work, that Mason, Friesl and Ford (2017) label conceptualisation work .
打造可持续市场,形成循环经济
在本章中,我们将探讨概念化和创建可持续市场的意义,以及为循环经济创建可持续市场的含义。在此过程中,我们考虑了现有的市场研究,这些研究试图解释如何动员集体产生相关市场的新概念(Fernandes, Mason和Chakrabarti 2019;Geiger et al. 2014;Mason, Friesl和Ford 2017),其中需要改变市场行为以使市场对社会和环境发挥良好作用(Geels 2010)。我们还借鉴了道德市场的概念。也就是说,采用某种形式的市场行为的市场如何被理解为具有自身价值。我们认为这对于理解循环经济是如何产生的至关重要。我们认为,道德市场揭示了无政府主义行为的某些价值,揭示了致力于实现这种变革的企业家和内部企业家的价值。方法-产生新的和更全面的认识和行动形式。确定了市场化工作的三种具体形式:1)演员角色的概念化,2)市场的概念化,以及3)商品的概念化。这些发现表明,战略网络是参与市场化的一种定位良好、装备精良的制度形式,更具体地说,是梅森、弗里斯尔和福特(2017)称之为概念化工作的一种特定形式的市场化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信