Calcium Phosphate Cement Cranioplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up

L. Hollier, S. Stal
{"title":"Calcium Phosphate Cement Cranioplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up","authors":"L. Hollier, S. Stal","doi":"10.5580/1c8f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of hydroxyapatite cements to replace bone deficits has entered widespread practice in craniofacial surgery. Although these substances have been shown to be at least partially replaced by bone in some experimental models, their long-term outcome in human cranial replacement or augmentation is not known. This study evaluated eight patients who had undergone cranioplasty using a hydroxyapatite cement. The cement was used in both inlay and onlay fashion. The mean follow-up interval was nineteen months and ranged from eight months to twenty-seven months. All patients underwent repeat CT scanning at the time of latest follow-up. Only one significant complication was noted, consisting of a postoperative persistent seroma that was resistant to repeat needle aspiration and required open drainage and removal of the material. CT scans revealed variable resorption of the cement in three cases. In the two cases in which the material was used primarily as an inlay, significant fragmentation of the material was seen. The appearance of the junction of the cement and the native bone was variable. While in some cases this interface could not be distinguished, in other areas it was seen as a distinct lucency. Although clinically minor asymmetries were noted in the appearance of the cranial vault and forehead, no patient was felt to be in need of revisional surgery. Even in areas of fragmentation, the reconstructions felt solid without evidence of mobility. No patient developed an infection or extruded the material. This study, though not providing histologic evidence, does seem to indicate that bone cements are well tolerated but are not always successfully firmly incorporated into the host bone.","PeriodicalId":284795,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/1c8f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of hydroxyapatite cements to replace bone deficits has entered widespread practice in craniofacial surgery. Although these substances have been shown to be at least partially replaced by bone in some experimental models, their long-term outcome in human cranial replacement or augmentation is not known. This study evaluated eight patients who had undergone cranioplasty using a hydroxyapatite cement. The cement was used in both inlay and onlay fashion. The mean follow-up interval was nineteen months and ranged from eight months to twenty-seven months. All patients underwent repeat CT scanning at the time of latest follow-up. Only one significant complication was noted, consisting of a postoperative persistent seroma that was resistant to repeat needle aspiration and required open drainage and removal of the material. CT scans revealed variable resorption of the cement in three cases. In the two cases in which the material was used primarily as an inlay, significant fragmentation of the material was seen. The appearance of the junction of the cement and the native bone was variable. While in some cases this interface could not be distinguished, in other areas it was seen as a distinct lucency. Although clinically minor asymmetries were noted in the appearance of the cranial vault and forehead, no patient was felt to be in need of revisional surgery. Even in areas of fragmentation, the reconstructions felt solid without evidence of mobility. No patient developed an infection or extruded the material. This study, though not providing histologic evidence, does seem to indicate that bone cements are well tolerated but are not always successfully firmly incorporated into the host bone.
磷酸钙骨水泥颅骨成形术:临床和影像学随访
羟基磷灰石骨水泥替代骨缺损已在颅面外科手术中广泛应用。尽管在一些实验模型中,这些物质已被证明至少部分被骨所取代,但它们在人类颅骨替代或增强中的长期结果尚不清楚。本研究评估了8例使用羟基磷灰石骨水泥进行颅骨成形术的患者。这种水泥既可以镶嵌也可以镶嵌。平均随访时间为19个月,从8个月到27个月不等。所有患者在最近一次随访时均进行了重复CT扫描。只有一个明显的并发症被注意到,包括术后持久的血清肿,抵抗重复针吸,需要开放引流和去除材料。CT扫描显示3例骨水泥有不同程度的吸收。在材料主要用作嵌体的两种情况下,可以看到材料的明显破碎。骨水泥与原骨交界处的外观是可变的。虽然在某些情况下,这个界面无法区分,但在其他领域,它被视为一个明显的透明。虽然临床上注意到颅顶和前额的外观轻微不对称,但没有患者认为需要翻修手术。即使是在支离破碎的地区,重建工作也很稳固,没有任何移动的迹象。没有患者发生感染或挤压材料。这项研究虽然没有提供组织学证据,但似乎确实表明骨水泥具有良好的耐受性,但并不总是成功地牢固地融入宿主骨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信