Comparing three lower bounding methods for DTW in time series classification

Nguyen Cong Thuong, D. T. Anh
{"title":"Comparing three lower bounding methods for DTW in time series classification","authors":"Nguyen Cong Thuong, D. T. Anh","doi":"10.1145/2350716.2350747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In comparison to Euclidean distance, Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) is a much more robust distance measure for time series data. For speeding up DTW computation, a few lower bounding techniques have been proposed in literature to guarantee no false dismissals in time series similarity search. In this work, we apply DTW lower bounding method in time series classification and empirically compare three different typical lower bounding techniques for DTW: LB_Keogh, FTW and LB_Improved in this time series data mining task. Our experimental results show that LB_Keogh and LB_Improved perform well with small warping window widths while FTW is only suitable with large warping window widths or without any constraint on warping windows. Besides, runtime efficiency of LB_Improved is quite poor due to its high complexity in lower bound computation despite of its better pruning power.","PeriodicalId":208300,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Information and Communication Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Information and Communication Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2350716.2350747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In comparison to Euclidean distance, Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) is a much more robust distance measure for time series data. For speeding up DTW computation, a few lower bounding techniques have been proposed in literature to guarantee no false dismissals in time series similarity search. In this work, we apply DTW lower bounding method in time series classification and empirically compare three different typical lower bounding techniques for DTW: LB_Keogh, FTW and LB_Improved in this time series data mining task. Our experimental results show that LB_Keogh and LB_Improved perform well with small warping window widths while FTW is only suitable with large warping window widths or without any constraint on warping windows. Besides, runtime efficiency of LB_Improved is quite poor due to its high complexity in lower bound computation despite of its better pruning power.
比较三种DTW下边界方法在时间序列分类中的应用
与欧氏距离相比,动态时间翘曲(DTW)是一种更加鲁棒的时间序列数据距离度量方法。为了加快DTW的计算速度,文献中提出了一些下边界技术来保证时间序列相似性搜索中不会出现假解雇。在这项工作中,我们将DTW下边界方法应用于时间序列分类,并在该时间序列数据挖掘任务中经验比较了三种不同的典型DTW下边界技术:LB_Keogh, FTW和LB_Improved。我们的实验结果表明,LB_Keogh和LB_Improved在较小的翘曲窗宽度下表现良好,而FTW只适用于较大的翘曲窗宽度或对翘曲窗没有任何约束。此外,LB_Improved虽然具有较好的剪枝能力,但由于下界计算复杂度高,运行时效率较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信