Communication policies performance: a case study

D. Tessera, A. Dubey
{"title":"Communication policies performance: a case study","authors":"D. Tessera, A. Dubey","doi":"10.1109/EMPDP.2001.905080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Communication activities are one of the most influential factors for the performance of parallel applications, and usually limit the number of processors that can be profitably allocated. Two components usually determine the communication cost of a parallel algorithm. One is the volume and range of data transfer, which is inherent to a specific algorithm. The other is the choice of communication strategy, e.g., point-to-point versus collective exchanges, blocking versus non blocking protocols, which has impact on setup costs, overheads due to buffering and/or contentions. Knowledge of comparative performance of different strategies can be very useful for a user if several choices are available. In this article we present the results of a study to determine the best approach to high volume, long range communications within the frame work of multidimensional FFT algorithm. We have investigated five widely used communication strategies, available in the MPI standard, which have identical data volumes and range of communications. We also present a systematic analysis of the causes of performance differences, with analytical models supporting the experimental evidence.","PeriodicalId":262971,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Ninth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Ninth Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMPDP.2001.905080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Communication activities are one of the most influential factors for the performance of parallel applications, and usually limit the number of processors that can be profitably allocated. Two components usually determine the communication cost of a parallel algorithm. One is the volume and range of data transfer, which is inherent to a specific algorithm. The other is the choice of communication strategy, e.g., point-to-point versus collective exchanges, blocking versus non blocking protocols, which has impact on setup costs, overheads due to buffering and/or contentions. Knowledge of comparative performance of different strategies can be very useful for a user if several choices are available. In this article we present the results of a study to determine the best approach to high volume, long range communications within the frame work of multidimensional FFT algorithm. We have investigated five widely used communication strategies, available in the MPI standard, which have identical data volumes and range of communications. We also present a systematic analysis of the causes of performance differences, with analytical models supporting the experimental evidence.
通信策略性能:一个案例研究
通信活动是影响并行应用程序性能的最重要因素之一,并且通常会限制可有效分配的处理器数量。两个组件通常决定并行算法的通信开销。一个是数据传输的数量和范围,这是特定算法所固有的。另一个是通信策略的选择,例如,点对点还是集体交换,阻塞还是非阻塞协议,这对设置成本、缓冲和/或争用造成的开销有影响。如果有多种选择,了解不同策略的比较性能对用户来说非常有用。在本文中,我们提出了一项研究的结果,以确定在多维FFT算法框架内实现大容量、远程通信的最佳方法。我们研究了MPI标准中可用的五种广泛使用的通信策略,它们具有相同的数据量和通信范围。我们还提出了性能差异的原因的系统分析,分析模型支持实验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信