Awarding Chinese-Language Cinemas: Imaginary Transnational Identities of the Golden Horse Awards

C. Lin
{"title":"Awarding Chinese-Language Cinemas: Imaginary Transnational Identities of the Golden Horse Awards","authors":"C. Lin","doi":"10.7560/vlt8903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Frequently referred to as the \"Chinese Oscars,\" the Golden Horse Awards, held in Taiwan annually since 1962, accept submissions from various Chinese-speaking countries despite China's suppression of Taiwan. This article reveals that the transnationalism of the Golden Horse Awards has been influenced by the cross-border tendency of early Chinese cinemas, the political turmoil of the past six decades in Taiwan, and the shifts in Chinese-language film industries in East and Southeast Asia under the influence of neoliberal globalization. It examines how the Golden Horse Awards have transformed from a tool of state ideology during the Cold War into an evaluating system that aims to promote both the global image of Taiwan and the artistic values of Chinese-language films in a broader sense. Drawing on theories from film festival and transnational cinema studies, this article further compares the Golden Horse Awards with the Cannes Film Festival to demonstrate the ways in which both festivals culturally legitimize local \"national\" cinema while aligning with transnational cinemas to counter larger film hegemonies. I bring the research up-to-date by examining the challenges the Golden Horse Awards have faced since China withdrew from the competition following political controversy at the 2018 ceremony. By focusing on how the Golden Horse Awards function both as a physical and an imaginary site that embodies the ambivalence of the umbrella term \"Chinese-language cinemas,\" this article sheds light on broader complex issues of national identities, globalization, and transnational cinemas in film awards studies.","PeriodicalId":335072,"journal":{"name":"The Velvet Light Trap","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Velvet Light Trap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/vlt8903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Frequently referred to as the "Chinese Oscars," the Golden Horse Awards, held in Taiwan annually since 1962, accept submissions from various Chinese-speaking countries despite China's suppression of Taiwan. This article reveals that the transnationalism of the Golden Horse Awards has been influenced by the cross-border tendency of early Chinese cinemas, the political turmoil of the past six decades in Taiwan, and the shifts in Chinese-language film industries in East and Southeast Asia under the influence of neoliberal globalization. It examines how the Golden Horse Awards have transformed from a tool of state ideology during the Cold War into an evaluating system that aims to promote both the global image of Taiwan and the artistic values of Chinese-language films in a broader sense. Drawing on theories from film festival and transnational cinema studies, this article further compares the Golden Horse Awards with the Cannes Film Festival to demonstrate the ways in which both festivals culturally legitimize local "national" cinema while aligning with transnational cinemas to counter larger film hegemonies. I bring the research up-to-date by examining the challenges the Golden Horse Awards have faced since China withdrew from the competition following political controversy at the 2018 ceremony. By focusing on how the Golden Horse Awards function both as a physical and an imaginary site that embodies the ambivalence of the umbrella term "Chinese-language cinemas," this article sheds light on broader complex issues of national identities, globalization, and transnational cinemas in film awards studies.
华语电影的颁发:金马奖的想象跨国身份
摘要:被称为“中国奥斯卡”的金马奖自1962年起每年在台湾举行,尽管中国政府压制台湾,但金马奖接受来自多个华语国家的参赛作品。本文认为,金马奖的跨国主义受到早期中国电影的跨界倾向、台湾过去60年的政治动荡以及新自由主义全球化影响下东亚和东南亚华语电影产业变迁的影响。它考察了金马奖如何从冷战时期的国家意识形态工具转变为一个旨在提升台湾全球形象和更广泛意义上华语电影艺术价值的评估体系。根据电影节和跨国电影研究的理论,本文进一步将金马奖与戛纳电影节进行比较,以展示两个电影节在文化上使当地“民族”电影合法化的方式,同时与跨国影院结盟,以对抗更大的电影霸权。我通过研究金马奖自中国在2018年颁奖典礼上因政治争议退出以来所面临的挑战,为研究提供了最新的信息。通过关注金马奖如何作为一个实体和想象的场所,体现了“华语电影院”这个总称的矛盾心理,本文揭示了电影奖项研究中国家认同、全球化和跨国电影院等更广泛的复杂问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信