Comparative Analysis of Digital Signature and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithms for the Validation of QR Code Vulnerabilities

Abdul Razaque, Vladislav Alexandrov, Muder Almiani, Bandar Alotaibi, M. Alotaibi, Ayman Al-Dmour
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Digital Signature and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithms for the Validation of QR Code Vulnerabilities","authors":"Abdul Razaque, Vladislav Alexandrov, Muder Almiani, Bandar Alotaibi, M. Alotaibi, Ayman Al-Dmour","doi":"10.1109/SDS54264.2021.9732150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quick response (QR) codes are currently used ubiq-uitously. Their interaction protocol design is initially unsecured. It forces users to scan QR codes, which makes it harder to differentiate a genuine code from a malicious one. Intruders can change the original QR code and make it fake, which can lead to phishing websites that collect sensitive data. The interaction model can be improved and made more secure by adding some modifications to the backend side of the application. This paper addresses the vulnerabilities of QR codes and recommends improvements in security design. Furthermore, two state-of-the-art algorithms, Digital Signature (DS) and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature (ECDS), are analytically compared to determine their strengths in QR code security.","PeriodicalId":394607,"journal":{"name":"2021 Eighth International Conference on Software Defined Systems (SDS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Eighth International Conference on Software Defined Systems (SDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SDS54264.2021.9732150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Quick response (QR) codes are currently used ubiq-uitously. Their interaction protocol design is initially unsecured. It forces users to scan QR codes, which makes it harder to differentiate a genuine code from a malicious one. Intruders can change the original QR code and make it fake, which can lead to phishing websites that collect sensitive data. The interaction model can be improved and made more secure by adding some modifications to the backend side of the application. This paper addresses the vulnerabilities of QR codes and recommends improvements in security design. Furthermore, two state-of-the-art algorithms, Digital Signature (DS) and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature (ECDS), are analytically compared to determine their strengths in QR code security.
数字签名与椭圆曲线数字签名算法在QR码漏洞验证中的比较分析
快速响应码(QR码)目前普遍使用。它们的交互协议设计最初是不安全的。它迫使用户扫描QR码,这使得区分正版代码和恶意代码变得更加困难。入侵者可以改变原始的QR码,使其成为假的,这可能导致网络钓鱼网站收集敏感数据。通过向应用程序的后端添加一些修改,可以改进交互模型并使其更加安全。本文讨论了QR码的漏洞,并提出了改进安全设计的建议。此外,分析比较了两种最先进的算法,数字签名(DS)和椭圆曲线数字签名(ECDS),以确定它们在QR码安全性方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信