Initial field evaluation of sulfonylurea herbicide resistant sugarbeet from somatic cell selection

S. E. Hart, J. Saunders, D. Penner, K. Renner
{"title":"Initial field evaluation of sulfonylurea herbicide resistant sugarbeet from somatic cell selection","authors":"S. E. Hart, J. Saunders, D. Penner, K. Renner","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.31.3.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Field studies were conducted with a sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding line segregating for monogenic dominant sulfonylurea herbicide resistance conditioned by the Sur 1 allele and obtained from somatic cell selection. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistant and susceptible sublines were compared to each other and to the commercially available susceptible cultivar MONO-HY E4 in regards to root yield, sugar content, and processing purity. In addition, the response of MONO-HY E4 and the sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible counterparts to simulated carryover sulfonylurea residues in soil and to postemergence (POST) applications of selected sulfonylurea herbicides was evaluated. In the absence of herbicides, counterpart resistant and susceptible sugarbeets produced similar root yield, sugar content, and clear juice purity at both locations. Nicosulfuron applied preplant incorporated (PPI) at 9 g ai ha −1 to simulate carryover in soil had no effect on the growth of sugarbeets from the resistant population or from the susceptible MONO-HY E4 cultivar seeded immediately after application. Primisulfuron and chlorimuron applied PPI at 10 and 3 g ai ha −1 , respectively, caused over 95% visible injury to the susceptible MONO-HY E4 sugarbeet 6 weeks after treatment (WAT), but had no adverse effect on the growth of resistant sugarbeet. POST application of primisulfuron at 40 and 80 g ai ha −1 , and thifensulfuron at 4 and 8 g ha −1 (one and two times the normal field use rate for corn and soybean, respectively), caused less than 15% visible injury to the resistant sugarbeet 4 WAT, but caused severe injury to the susceptible MONO-HY E4 sugarbeet. The sulfonylurea resistant sugarbeet was tolerant to POST applications of primisulfuron at four times and thifensulfuron at two times the field use rate. This magnitude of resistance is great enough for effective use of primisulfuron and thifensulfuron for weed control in sulfonylurea resistant sugarbeet","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.31.3.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Field studies were conducted with a sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding line segregating for monogenic dominant sulfonylurea herbicide resistance conditioned by the Sur 1 allele and obtained from somatic cell selection. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistant and susceptible sublines were compared to each other and to the commercially available susceptible cultivar MONO-HY E4 in regards to root yield, sugar content, and processing purity. In addition, the response of MONO-HY E4 and the sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible counterparts to simulated carryover sulfonylurea residues in soil and to postemergence (POST) applications of selected sulfonylurea herbicides was evaluated. In the absence of herbicides, counterpart resistant and susceptible sugarbeets produced similar root yield, sugar content, and clear juice purity at both locations. Nicosulfuron applied preplant incorporated (PPI) at 9 g ai ha −1 to simulate carryover in soil had no effect on the growth of sugarbeets from the resistant population or from the susceptible MONO-HY E4 cultivar seeded immediately after application. Primisulfuron and chlorimuron applied PPI at 10 and 3 g ai ha −1 , respectively, caused over 95% visible injury to the susceptible MONO-HY E4 sugarbeet 6 weeks after treatment (WAT), but had no adverse effect on the growth of resistant sugarbeet. POST application of primisulfuron at 40 and 80 g ai ha −1 , and thifensulfuron at 4 and 8 g ha −1 (one and two times the normal field use rate for corn and soybean, respectively), caused less than 15% visible injury to the resistant sugarbeet 4 WAT, but caused severe injury to the susceptible MONO-HY E4 sugarbeet. The sulfonylurea resistant sugarbeet was tolerant to POST applications of primisulfuron at four times and thifensulfuron at two times the field use rate. This magnitude of resistance is great enough for effective use of primisulfuron and thifensulfuron for weed control in sulfonylurea resistant sugarbeet
甜菜抗磺酰脲除草剂的体细胞选择初步田间评价
以甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)为材料,利用体细胞选择获得的Sur 1等位基因对磺酰脲类除草剂抗性单基因显性选育株系进行了田间研究。在根产量、含糖量和加工纯度方面,对磺酰脲除草剂抗性和敏感亚系进行了比较,并与市售的敏感品种MONO-HY E4进行了比较。此外,还评价了MONO-HY E4和磺酰脲抗性和敏感对应物对土壤中模拟残留磺酰脲的反应,以及对选定磺酰脲类除草剂出苗期后施用的反应。在没有除草剂的情况下,抗性和易感甜菜在两个地点产生相似的根产量、糖含量和清汁纯度。施用9 g / ha - 1浓度的硝磺隆模拟土壤携带效应,对抗性群体和施用后立即播种的敏感品种MONO-HY E4的甜菜生长没有影响。施用PPI (10 g / ha - 1)和PPI (3 g / ha - 1)后6周,对敏感的MONO-HY E4甜菜造成95%以上的可见损伤,但对抗性甜菜的生长无不良影响。施用40和80 g百硫隆,4和8 g噻虫隆(分别为玉米和大豆正常田间用量的1倍和2倍)后,对抗性甜菜4 WAT造成的可见伤害不到15%,但对敏感的MONO-HY E4甜菜造成严重伤害。抗磺酰脲甜菜对四倍施用磺胺磺隆和两倍施用噻虫磺隆具有耐受性。这种抗性程度足以有效地利用磺胺磺脲和噻虫磺隆防治抗磺脲甜菜的杂草
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信