The Trope of Displacement, the Disruption of Space: Cuba, a Moveable Nation

Andrea O’Reilly Herrera
{"title":"The Trope of Displacement, the Disruption of Space: Cuba, a Moveable Nation","authors":"Andrea O’Reilly Herrera","doi":"10.1515/9783110626209-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migration, Søren Frank observes, is the defining characteristic of modern life (Salman). Focusing primarily on the work of Salman Rushdie, Frank examines the mutually dependent phenomena of migration, globalization, and cosmopolitanism. In “Step Across This Line,” he points out, Rushdie describes the migrant as a person “without frontiers,” an “archetypal figure of our age,” who somehow defies the laws of gravity. The migrant “perform[s] the act of which all men anciently dream,” Rushdie claims, “the thing for which they envy the birds; that is to say, we have flown” (qtd. in Frank, “Globalization” 111). Undergirding Frank’s exploration is a particular idea of weightlessness, first developed by Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht in his seminal essay “A Negative Anthropology of Globalization.” In “Globalization, Migration Literature, and the New Europe” Frank observes that Gumbrecht “initially distills two key characteristics: the increasing amount of information available to practically all human beings”—a result of the electronic age and ever increasing access to social media—and the idea that “this information (and its circulation)” becomes increasingly “detached from particular physical spaces” (107). Inspired by Gumbrecht’s characterization of globalization as a growing spacelessness—with its attendant elimination of the dimension of space— Frank posits what he terms the “double movement of elimination and recuperation of space,” which points toward an idea of cosmopolitanism distinguished by a “growing independence of particular spaces,” which are simultaneously characterized by “reactions of inertia [that] make them reconnect with dimensions of space” (“Globalization” 110). Although traditional definitions of the cosmopolitan hint at the possibility of suspending the dimension of spatiality and allowing the paradoxical concept that one can simultaneously belong everywhere and nowhere—a kind of cultural or ethnic weightlessness, so to speak—post-1959 Cuban political discourse on both sides of","PeriodicalId":321944,"journal":{"name":"New Cosmopolitanisms, Race, and Ethnicity","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Cosmopolitanisms, Race, and Ethnicity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110626209-014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Migration, Søren Frank observes, is the defining characteristic of modern life (Salman). Focusing primarily on the work of Salman Rushdie, Frank examines the mutually dependent phenomena of migration, globalization, and cosmopolitanism. In “Step Across This Line,” he points out, Rushdie describes the migrant as a person “without frontiers,” an “archetypal figure of our age,” who somehow defies the laws of gravity. The migrant “perform[s] the act of which all men anciently dream,” Rushdie claims, “the thing for which they envy the birds; that is to say, we have flown” (qtd. in Frank, “Globalization” 111). Undergirding Frank’s exploration is a particular idea of weightlessness, first developed by Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht in his seminal essay “A Negative Anthropology of Globalization.” In “Globalization, Migration Literature, and the New Europe” Frank observes that Gumbrecht “initially distills two key characteristics: the increasing amount of information available to practically all human beings”—a result of the electronic age and ever increasing access to social media—and the idea that “this information (and its circulation)” becomes increasingly “detached from particular physical spaces” (107). Inspired by Gumbrecht’s characterization of globalization as a growing spacelessness—with its attendant elimination of the dimension of space— Frank posits what he terms the “double movement of elimination and recuperation of space,” which points toward an idea of cosmopolitanism distinguished by a “growing independence of particular spaces,” which are simultaneously characterized by “reactions of inertia [that] make them reconnect with dimensions of space” (“Globalization” 110). Although traditional definitions of the cosmopolitan hint at the possibility of suspending the dimension of spatiality and allowing the paradoxical concept that one can simultaneously belong everywhere and nowhere—a kind of cultural or ethnic weightlessness, so to speak—post-1959 Cuban political discourse on both sides of
位移的比喻,空间的破坏:古巴,一个可移动的国家
Søren Frank观察到,迁移是现代生活的决定性特征(Salman)。弗兰克主要关注萨尔曼·拉什迪的作品,研究了移民、全球化和世界主义等相互依存的现象。在《跨越这条线》一书中,他指出,拉什迪将移民描述为一个“没有边界”的人,一个“我们这个时代的典型人物”,他们以某种方式藐视万有引力定律。迁徙者“做了所有人自古以来都梦想的事,”拉什迪说,“他们羡慕鸟儿的事;也就是说,我们已经飞过了。”见弗兰克,“全球化”111)。支撑弗兰克探索的是一个特殊的失重概念,这个概念最早是由汉斯·乌尔里希·冈布雷希特在他的开创性论文《全球化的消极人类学》中提出的。在《全球化、移民文学和新欧洲》一书中,弗兰克观察到冈布雷希特“最初提炼出两个关键特征:几乎所有人都能获得越来越多的信息”——这是电子时代和不断增加的社交媒体的结果——以及“这些信息(及其流通)”越来越“脱离特定的物理空间”的观点(107)。受古布莱希特将全球化描述为一种不断增长的无空间性(伴随着空间维度的消除)的启发,弗兰克提出了他所谓的“空间消除和恢复的双重运动”,这指向了一种以“特定空间的日益独立”为特征的世界主义思想,同时以“惯性的反应使它们与空间维度重新连接”为特征(“全球化”110)。尽管世界主义的传统定义暗示了暂停空间维度的可能性,并允许一个矛盾的概念,即一个人可以同时属于任何地方,也不属于任何地方-一种文化或种族失重,可以这么说-1959年后的古巴政治话语双方
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信