Behavioral Tendencies in Newsvendor Decision Making: Capturing the Chinese Perspective

Yin Cui, L. Chen, Jian Chen, S. Gavirneni
{"title":"Behavioral Tendencies in Newsvendor Decision Making: Capturing the Chinese Perspective","authors":"Yin Cui, L. Chen, Jian Chen, S. Gavirneni","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1737479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After many decades on focusing only on quantitative approaches for making decisions in manufacturing and supply chain management, researchers in operations management have recently acknowledged the importance of understanding the human behavior tendencies underlying these decisions. The result is a new stream of research in operations management focused on experiments using human subjects. However, most of these experiments were conducted in the US and Europe with the subject pool (students as well as practitioners) with western cultural and educational backgrounds. As the students and practitioners in China are culturally and educationally different from their western counterparts, it is conceivable that their behavioral tendencies are very different. Given that a large portion of the world’s industrial output comes from China, an understanding of the behavioral tendencies specific to those geographical regions is essential to achieve significant efficiency gains in the world economy. We compare results from experiments conducted in the US and China and observe that Chinese decision makers (i) ask a lot more questions before reaching their decision indicating that they are more worried about making the wrong decision; (ii) are more frequently able to come up with a new number as their decision whereas the American decision makers tend to use one of the given numbers as their decision; and (iii) are more cognizant of salvage values and as a result order more than the American decision makers.","PeriodicalId":309400,"journal":{"name":"Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University Research Paper Series","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1737479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

After many decades on focusing only on quantitative approaches for making decisions in manufacturing and supply chain management, researchers in operations management have recently acknowledged the importance of understanding the human behavior tendencies underlying these decisions. The result is a new stream of research in operations management focused on experiments using human subjects. However, most of these experiments were conducted in the US and Europe with the subject pool (students as well as practitioners) with western cultural and educational backgrounds. As the students and practitioners in China are culturally and educationally different from their western counterparts, it is conceivable that their behavioral tendencies are very different. Given that a large portion of the world’s industrial output comes from China, an understanding of the behavioral tendencies specific to those geographical regions is essential to achieve significant efficiency gains in the world economy. We compare results from experiments conducted in the US and China and observe that Chinese decision makers (i) ask a lot more questions before reaching their decision indicating that they are more worried about making the wrong decision; (ii) are more frequently able to come up with a new number as their decision whereas the American decision makers tend to use one of the given numbers as their decision; and (iii) are more cognizant of salvage values and as a result order more than the American decision makers.
报贩决策中的行为倾向:捕捉中国人的视角
几十年来,运营管理的研究人员只关注制造和供应链管理中的定量决策方法,最近他们认识到理解这些决策背后的人类行为倾向的重要性。其结果是一个新的研究流的运营管理集中在实验使用人类受试者。然而,这些实验大多是在美国和欧洲进行的,受试者池(学生和从业者)具有西方文化和教育背景。由于中国的学生和从业者在文化和教育上与西方同行不同,可想而知,他们的行为倾向是非常不同的。鉴于世界工业产出的很大一部分来自中国,了解这些地理区域的特定行为趋势对于在世界经济中实现显著的效率提升至关重要。我们比较了在美国和中国进行的实验结果,观察到中国决策者(i)在做出决定之前问了更多的问题,这表明他们更担心做出错误的决定;(ii)他们更经常能够提出一个新的数字作为他们的决定,而美国决策者倾向于使用一个给定的数字作为他们的决定;(iii)比美国决策者更了解救助价值,因此更重视救助价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信