{"title":"How Do Users Talk About Software? Searching for Common Ground","authors":"B. Paech, K. Schneider","doi":"10.1109/REthics51204.2020.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current research on ethics in software engineering focuses on the values of stakeholders and their tradeoffs. While an under-standing of these values is very important, it is not sufficient for a discussion about ethical values between developers and users or in society in general. Values need to be related to the func-tional and quality features of software. In this paper, we argue that we need a better understanding of the user view of software as a common ground for any discussion about the effects of software for its users. When users talk about software, com-pare its features, or complain about its usability, they do not use the terminology and mental models of IT-experts. This hinders effective communication about software in society. However, one cannot expect users to talk like developers. In order to provide such a common ground, we propose to study user utterances and to define a so-called user view lan-guage which comprises the concepts and relationships with which users describe the outside view of software. In this posi-tion paper, we present assumptions and hypotheses related to defining such a language. Furthermore, we present first ideas how to study user utterances. This will help us to better under-stand the current situation: how do users talk about software?","PeriodicalId":350879,"journal":{"name":"2020 1st Workshop on Ethics in Requirements Engineering Research and Practice (REthics)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 1st Workshop on Ethics in Requirements Engineering Research and Practice (REthics)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REthics51204.2020.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Current research on ethics in software engineering focuses on the values of stakeholders and their tradeoffs. While an under-standing of these values is very important, it is not sufficient for a discussion about ethical values between developers and users or in society in general. Values need to be related to the func-tional and quality features of software. In this paper, we argue that we need a better understanding of the user view of software as a common ground for any discussion about the effects of software for its users. When users talk about software, com-pare its features, or complain about its usability, they do not use the terminology and mental models of IT-experts. This hinders effective communication about software in society. However, one cannot expect users to talk like developers. In order to provide such a common ground, we propose to study user utterances and to define a so-called user view lan-guage which comprises the concepts and relationships with which users describe the outside view of software. In this posi-tion paper, we present assumptions and hypotheses related to defining such a language. Furthermore, we present first ideas how to study user utterances. This will help us to better under-stand the current situation: how do users talk about software?