Legal Protection For The Winner Of Execution Auction Over The Auction Object That Sued Before District Court

Dwi Ayu Rachmawati, N. Aprilianda, Siti Noer Endah
{"title":"Legal Protection For The Winner Of Execution Auction Over The Auction Object That Sued Before District Court","authors":"Dwi Ayu Rachmawati, N. Aprilianda, Siti Noer Endah","doi":"10.29303/ULREV.V2I2.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the process of auction execution often arise a lawsuit over the auction implementation, this is because the auction of execution is done not on the willingness of the owner of the goods themselves but because the law gives authority to the creditors to conduct public auction on the guarantee of debtors that default. So in the process of conveyance of auction object from the seller to the auction buyer often cause a problem, such as can not be mastered by auction winner the auction object. The purpose of this research is to know how to find out how the legal protection for the winner of the auction of execution of mortgage rights in mastering the auction object on the auction object which filed the lawsuit to the state court. This research is done by normative method. Based on the research that has been done, the winner of the auction can not be directly mastering the auction object because there is a civil suit over the auction object are expanding following. This is as article 3 paragraph (1), (2), and subsection (3) of the regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/head of the national land Agency number 13 Year 2017 on The Block and confiscation who explains that if there is a dispute or conflict over land rights law the land that became the object of the auction then blocking would have done. And the protection of the law against the winner of the auction provided by regulation of the Minister of finance Number 27/PMK. 06/2016 Hints would about implementation of auctions, HIR. In addition, in article 19 paragraph (1) of law No. 8 Year 1999 on the protection of Consumers and in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court's verdict against RI No. 1068 K/Pdt/2008 Dated January 21, 2009 in National Conference MA Year 2011.","PeriodicalId":406021,"journal":{"name":"Unram Law Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unram Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ULREV.V2I2.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the process of auction execution often arise a lawsuit over the auction implementation, this is because the auction of execution is done not on the willingness of the owner of the goods themselves but because the law gives authority to the creditors to conduct public auction on the guarantee of debtors that default. So in the process of conveyance of auction object from the seller to the auction buyer often cause a problem, such as can not be mastered by auction winner the auction object. The purpose of this research is to know how to find out how the legal protection for the winner of the auction of execution of mortgage rights in mastering the auction object on the auction object which filed the lawsuit to the state court. This research is done by normative method. Based on the research that has been done, the winner of the auction can not be directly mastering the auction object because there is a civil suit over the auction object are expanding following. This is as article 3 paragraph (1), (2), and subsection (3) of the regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial/head of the national land Agency number 13 Year 2017 on The Block and confiscation who explains that if there is a dispute or conflict over land rights law the land that became the object of the auction then blocking would have done. And the protection of the law against the winner of the auction provided by regulation of the Minister of finance Number 27/PMK. 06/2016 Hints would about implementation of auctions, HIR. In addition, in article 19 paragraph (1) of law No. 8 Year 1999 on the protection of Consumers and in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court's verdict against RI No. 1068 K/Pdt/2008 Dated January 21, 2009 in National Conference MA Year 2011.
执行拍卖中标人对地方法院提起诉讼的拍卖标的的法律保护
在拍卖执行过程中经常出现拍卖执行的诉讼,这是因为拍卖执行不是基于货物所有人自己的意愿进行的,而是因为法律赋予债权人以债务人违约担保为前提进行公开拍卖的权力。因此在拍卖标的从卖方转移到拍卖买方的过程中,往往会出现拍卖中标人无法掌握拍卖标的等问题。本研究的目的在于了解如何在掌握拍卖标的的情况下,对向国家法院提起诉讼的拍卖标的进行法律保护。本研究采用规范方法进行。根据已有的研究,由于对拍卖标的的民事诉讼不断扩大,拍卖的中标人不能直接掌握拍卖标的。这是农业事务和空间部长/国家土地机构负责人2017年第13号关于封锁和没收的条例第3条第(1)款,(2)款和第(3)款的规定,他解释说,如果在土地权利法律上存在争议或冲突,那么成为拍卖对象的土地就会被封锁。以及由财政部长第27/PMK号条例提供的针对拍卖获胜者的法律保护。2016年6月关于拍卖、HIR实施的提示。此外,在1999年第8号关于保护消费者的法律第19条第(1)款和最高法院在2011年全国会议上对2009年1月21日第1068 K/Pdt/2008号RI的判决的判例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信