Analysis of Selectivity, Timing, Persistence and Correlation of Islamic vs. Conventional Saudi Mutual Funds

Karim Soussou, Abdelwahed Omri
{"title":"Analysis of Selectivity, Timing, Persistence and Correlation of Islamic vs. Conventional Saudi Mutual Funds","authors":"Karim Soussou, Abdelwahed Omri","doi":"10.11648/j.ijfbr.20230901.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The purpose of this study was to evaluate the selectivity and timing performance and persistence in active Saudi mutual funds through a comparative work involving 100 Islamic funds against 51 conventional funds trading in Saudi TADAWUL stock Exchange from 2010 to 2015. We have split each group based on 6 regional investment categories: Local, International, Arab, Asian, European and American (US). We employed specific models to assess selectivity and timing performance. Then we investigated their persistence. Findings indicated superior selectivity with Arab Islamic funds compared to conventional peers and similar negative selectivity in both Islamic and conventional International funds. In addition, there was evidence of selectivity with US conventional funds, and none with Islamic peers. Furthermore, results showed significantly higher timing with local and Arab conventional funds compared to their respective Islamic peers. As for the performance persistence, there were signs of selectivity and timing persistence for both Islamic and conventional funds, mostly on local, International and Arab levels. Nevertheless, Islamic funds’ performance persistence in both skills was longer. Finally, both Islamic and conventional selectivity and timing were negatively correlated overall, indicating skills’ mutual exclusiveness and specialization. We recommend studying a larger sample, for a longer period. Different grouping may be applied, based on asset classes, i.e. Equity, Bond, Balanced, Income, etc. The study can even extend to a multi-market or multi-regional investigation i.e. MENA region.","PeriodicalId":425329,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Finance and Banking Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Finance and Banking Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfbr.20230901.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the selectivity and timing performance and persistence in active Saudi mutual funds through a comparative work involving 100 Islamic funds against 51 conventional funds trading in Saudi TADAWUL stock Exchange from 2010 to 2015. We have split each group based on 6 regional investment categories: Local, International, Arab, Asian, European and American (US). We employed specific models to assess selectivity and timing performance. Then we investigated their persistence. Findings indicated superior selectivity with Arab Islamic funds compared to conventional peers and similar negative selectivity in both Islamic and conventional International funds. In addition, there was evidence of selectivity with US conventional funds, and none with Islamic peers. Furthermore, results showed significantly higher timing with local and Arab conventional funds compared to their respective Islamic peers. As for the performance persistence, there were signs of selectivity and timing persistence for both Islamic and conventional funds, mostly on local, International and Arab levels. Nevertheless, Islamic funds’ performance persistence in both skills was longer. Finally, both Islamic and conventional selectivity and timing were negatively correlated overall, indicating skills’ mutual exclusiveness and specialization. We recommend studying a larger sample, for a longer period. Different grouping may be applied, based on asset classes, i.e. Equity, Bond, Balanced, Income, etc. The study can even extend to a multi-market or multi-regional investigation i.e. MENA region.
伊斯兰与传统沙特共同基金的选择性、时机、持久性和相关性分析
本研究的目的是通过2010年至2015年在沙特TADAWUL证券交易所交易的100只伊斯兰基金与51只传统基金的比较工作,评估积极的沙特共同基金的选择性、时机表现和持久性。我们根据6个区域投资类别划分每个组:本地,国际,阿拉伯,亚洲,欧洲和美洲(美国)。我们采用特定的模型来评估选择性和定时性能。然后我们调查了他们的持久性。研究结果表明,与传统基金相比,阿拉伯伊斯兰基金的选择性更高,伊斯兰基金和传统国际基金的选择性也类似。此外,有证据表明,美国传统基金存在选择性,而伊斯兰同行则没有。此外,结果显示,与各自的伊斯兰同行相比,当地和阿拉伯传统基金的时机明显更高。至于业绩的持续性,有迹象表明伊斯兰基金和传统基金都有选择性和时机的持续性,主要是在当地、国际和阿拉伯一级。然而,伊斯兰基金在这两项技能上的表现持续时间更长。最后,伊斯兰和传统的选择性和时间总体上呈负相关,表明技能的相互排他性和专业化。我们建议研究更大的样本,更长的时间。根据资产类别,可以采用不同的分组,即股票、债券、余额、收益等。该研究甚至可以扩展到一个多市场或多区域的调查,即中东和北非地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信