Human Perceptions and Community Initiatives to the COVID-19 Pandemic

M. Hamiduzzaman, M. Islam
{"title":"Human Perceptions and Community Initiatives to the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"M. Hamiduzzaman, M. Islam","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-8402-6.ch003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Millions of human beings are affected COVID-19 worldwide, but the constellation of health and socioeconomic effects of the pandemic varies between developed and developing countries. While the crisis has drawn attention in media as life and livelihood hazard, the differences in human perceptions between developed and developing worlds remain under-documented. The authors explain how different human perceptions are embodied in Australia and Bangladesh in the pandemic by examining the countries' health measures and community initiatives. The rates of COVID-19 infections and deaths were consistently higher in Bangladesh than in Australia. While the Australian government and the Australians showed maturity in managing effects of COVID-19, erratic lockdown measures and imprudent policy decisions by the Bangladesh government together with its inadequate acute care services and income concerns influenced the people's psychosocial perceptions. The study highlights the importance of strengthening the health system and food and income security and investing in community programs in Bangladesh.","PeriodicalId":128412,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Research on Asian Perspectives of the Educational Impact of COVID-19","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Research on Asian Perspectives of the Educational Impact of COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8402-6.ch003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Millions of human beings are affected COVID-19 worldwide, but the constellation of health and socioeconomic effects of the pandemic varies between developed and developing countries. While the crisis has drawn attention in media as life and livelihood hazard, the differences in human perceptions between developed and developing worlds remain under-documented. The authors explain how different human perceptions are embodied in Australia and Bangladesh in the pandemic by examining the countries' health measures and community initiatives. The rates of COVID-19 infections and deaths were consistently higher in Bangladesh than in Australia. While the Australian government and the Australians showed maturity in managing effects of COVID-19, erratic lockdown measures and imprudent policy decisions by the Bangladesh government together with its inadequate acute care services and income concerns influenced the people's psychosocial perceptions. The study highlights the importance of strengthening the health system and food and income security and investing in community programs in Bangladesh.
人类对COVID-19大流行的认识和社区举措
全世界有数百万人受到COVID-19的影响,但这一流行病对健康和社会经济的影响在发达国家和发展中国家有所不同。虽然这场危机作为危及生命和生计的危机引起了媒体的关注,但发达国家和发展中国家之间人类观念的差异仍然没有得到充分的记录。作者通过检查澳大利亚和孟加拉国的卫生措施和社区倡议,解释了人们对疫情的不同看法是如何体现在这两个国家的。孟加拉国的COVID-19感染率和死亡率一直高于澳大利亚。虽然澳大利亚政府和澳大利亚人在应对新冠肺炎影响方面表现出成熟,但孟加拉国政府不稳定的封锁措施和轻率的政策决定,加上急症护理服务不足和收入担忧,影响了人们的心理社会观念。该研究强调了加强孟加拉国卫生系统、粮食和收入保障以及投资社区项目的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信