Transient Hepatic Elastography in the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Patients After Liver Transplantation

Larisse Longo, Henrique Mariano Pereira Matheus, Deivid Cruz dos Santos, Matheus Trucollo Michalczuk, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt Cersk, M. Álvares-da-Silva
{"title":"Transient Hepatic Elastography in the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Patients After Liver Transplantation","authors":"Larisse Longo, Henrique Mariano Pereira Matheus, Deivid Cruz dos Santos, Matheus Trucollo Michalczuk, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt Cersk, M. Álvares-da-Silva","doi":"10.52787/wdom2933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objectives. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessing fibrosis and inflammation in liver transplant recipients. As this study has risks, the use of noninvasive tools has been proposed, including transient elastography, a method that needs further study in this population, which is the purpose of this research. Material and methods. Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively in patients who received a liver transplant, underwent liver biopsy and transient elastography less than 1 year apart. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and Kappa concordance test between the two methods were determined. Results. Of 356 patients evaluated after transplantation, 45 underwent liver biopsy and transient elastography within 1 year; 60.0% were male and 75.6% had hepatitis C virus infection. At the time of transient elastography, laboratory values were: mean total bilirubin 1.5 mg/dL, alanine aminotransferase 108.1 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase, 101.6 U/L, alkaline phosphatase, 96.0 U/L and gamma-glutamyl transferase 9.0 U/L. The main indications for liver biopsy were assessment for rejection, hepatitis C virus infection or both. According to liver biopsy, 82.2% presented absent or minimal fibrosis and 75.6% had no inflammation. Acute cellular rejection was present in 20.0% of cases. A cut-off point of > 9.5 kPa was used to define advanced fibrosis, while a value < 7.5 kPa was set to indicate absent or mild fibrosis. Poor agreement was found between transient elastography and liver biopsy for these categories (Kappa 0.125, sensitivity 69.5%, specificity 66.7%) and for specific stages of fibrosis (Kappa 0.095). Conclusions. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were low for fibrosis staging when comparing transient elastography with liver biopsy. In liver transplant recipients, transient elastography would overestimate fibrosis, probably due to inflammation secondary to other causes.","PeriodicalId":270053,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastroenterológica latinoamericana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastroenterológica latinoamericana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52787/wdom2933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessing fibrosis and inflammation in liver transplant recipients. As this study has risks, the use of noninvasive tools has been proposed, including transient elastography, a method that needs further study in this population, which is the purpose of this research. Material and methods. Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively in patients who received a liver transplant, underwent liver biopsy and transient elastography less than 1 year apart. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and Kappa concordance test between the two methods were determined. Results. Of 356 patients evaluated after transplantation, 45 underwent liver biopsy and transient elastography within 1 year; 60.0% were male and 75.6% had hepatitis C virus infection. At the time of transient elastography, laboratory values were: mean total bilirubin 1.5 mg/dL, alanine aminotransferase 108.1 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase, 101.6 U/L, alkaline phosphatase, 96.0 U/L and gamma-glutamyl transferase 9.0 U/L. The main indications for liver biopsy were assessment for rejection, hepatitis C virus infection or both. According to liver biopsy, 82.2% presented absent or minimal fibrosis and 75.6% had no inflammation. Acute cellular rejection was present in 20.0% of cases. A cut-off point of > 9.5 kPa was used to define advanced fibrosis, while a value < 7.5 kPa was set to indicate absent or mild fibrosis. Poor agreement was found between transient elastography and liver biopsy for these categories (Kappa 0.125, sensitivity 69.5%, specificity 66.7%) and for specific stages of fibrosis (Kappa 0.095). Conclusions. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were low for fibrosis staging when comparing transient elastography with liver biopsy. In liver transplant recipients, transient elastography would overestimate fibrosis, probably due to inflammation secondary to other causes.
肝移植术后肝纤维化的瞬时肝弹性成像评价
引言和目标。肝活检是评估肝移植受者纤维化和炎症的金标准。由于该研究存在风险,因此建议使用非侵入性工具,包括瞬态弹性成像,这是一种需要在该人群中进一步研究的方法,这也是本研究的目的。材料和方法。回顾性收集了接受肝移植、肝活检和短暂弹性成像间隔不到1年的患者的人口学和临床资料。比较两种方法的敏感性、特异性、诊断准确性和Kappa一致性检验。结果。在移植后评估的356例患者中,45例在1年内进行了肝活检和短暂弹性成像;60.0%为男性,75.6%为丙型肝炎病毒感染。瞬时弹性成像时,实验室值为:平均总胆红素1.5 mg/dL,丙氨酸转氨酶108.1 U/L,天冬氨酸转氨酶101.6 U/L,碱性磷酸酶96.0 U/L, γ -谷氨酰转移酶9.0 U/L。肝活检的主要适应症是评估排斥反应、丙型肝炎病毒感染或两者兼而有之。根据肝活检,82.2%表现为无纤维化或轻微纤维化,75.6%无炎症。20.0%的病例出现急性细胞排斥反应。临界值> 9.5 kPa用于定义晚期纤维化,而临界值< 7.5 kPa用于表示无纤维化或轻度纤维化。瞬时弹性成像和肝活检在这些类别(Kappa 0.125,敏感性69.5%,特异性66.7%)和特定纤维化阶段(Kappa 0.095)的一致性较差。结论。与肝活检相比,瞬时弹性成像对纤维化分期的准确性、敏感性和特异性较低。在肝移植受者中,瞬时弹性成像会高估纤维化,可能是由于其他原因引起的炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信