Appropriate Damping on Seismic Design Analysis for Inelastic Response Assessment of Piping

Tomoyoshi Watakabe, M. Morishita
{"title":"Appropriate Damping on Seismic Design Analysis for Inelastic Response Assessment of Piping","authors":"Tomoyoshi Watakabe, M. Morishita","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current seismic design rule on piping assumes elastic analysis without the effect of response reduction due to plasticity, although some degree of plasticity is allowed in its allowable limits. Damping for the seismic design analysis is conservatively determined depending on the number of supports and thermal insulation conditions. These conservative assumptions lead to large amount of design margin. Based on such recognition, to provide a more rational seismic design method, a new Code Case for seismic design of piping is now under development in the framework of JSME Nuclear Codes and Standards as an alternative rule to the current design rule. The Code Case provides detailed inelastic analysis with using shell or solid FEA models as a more rational method. Simplified analysis with an additional damping taking the response reduction due to plasticity into account is now under consideration to incorporate the convenience in design. In this study, a series of analysis was made to see the adequacy of the simplified inelastic analysis. Design margins contained in the current design analysis method composed of response spectrum analysis and stress factors was quantitatively assessed in the view point of additional damping.","PeriodicalId":180537,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current seismic design rule on piping assumes elastic analysis without the effect of response reduction due to plasticity, although some degree of plasticity is allowed in its allowable limits. Damping for the seismic design analysis is conservatively determined depending on the number of supports and thermal insulation conditions. These conservative assumptions lead to large amount of design margin. Based on such recognition, to provide a more rational seismic design method, a new Code Case for seismic design of piping is now under development in the framework of JSME Nuclear Codes and Standards as an alternative rule to the current design rule. The Code Case provides detailed inelastic analysis with using shell or solid FEA models as a more rational method. Simplified analysis with an additional damping taking the response reduction due to plasticity into account is now under consideration to incorporate the convenience in design. In this study, a series of analysis was made to see the adequacy of the simplified inelastic analysis. Design margins contained in the current design analysis method composed of response spectrum analysis and stress factors was quantitatively assessed in the view point of additional damping.
管道非弹性反应评估中适当阻尼的抗震设计分析
目前的管道抗震设计规则采用弹性分析,不考虑塑性引起的响应减小,但在允许范围内允许有一定程度的塑性。抗震设计分析的阻尼是根据支座数量和保温条件保守确定的。这些保守的假设导致了大量的设计余量。基于这样的认识,为了提供更合理的抗震设计方法,目前正在JSME核规范与标准框架下制定新的管道抗震设计规范案例,作为现行设计规则的替代规则。代码案例提供了详细的非弹性分析,使用壳或实体有限元模型作为更合理的方法。考虑到由于塑性引起的响应减小,现在正在考虑采用附加阻尼的简化分析,以使设计更加方便。在本研究中,进行了一系列的分析,以了解简化的非弹性分析的充分性。从附加阻尼的角度定量评价了当前由响应谱分析和应力因子组成的设计分析方法所包含的设计余量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信