Efficient FDP Optimization for AI Enhanced Decision Making

G. de Paola, Richar Villarroel Danger
{"title":"Efficient FDP Optimization for AI Enhanced Decision Making","authors":"G. de Paola, Richar Villarroel Danger","doi":"10.2118/214345-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The present work introduces an efficient workflow for AI-enhanced decision-making in Field Development Planning Optimization. Despite the clear importance of uncertainty quantification in decision-making, we find that constraints in time, hardware, and costs are often limiting factors during field evaluation, with the drawback of having a biased uncertainty description or a wrong risk perception. The proposed work encompasses history matching, solution analysis, and production optimization with special emphasis on reducing both simulation and processing time, maximizing what we can call the result per core hour.\n At the center of our work is an AI-guided optimizer suited to avoid excessive convergence bias and maintain an optimal exploration vs. exploitation performance. The optimizer allows the integration of a multi-objective (MO) formulation in standard history matching and optimization workflows. Despite the flexibility of MO optimization and the vast literature in the energy industry, its usage in real-field cases has always been quite limited due to its formulation availability in commercial software and the increased computation time. This work will show improvement in solution accuracy and formulation flexibility compared to Single Objective (SO) formulations at no increase in runtime.\n MO is based on the iterative convergence of an efficient frontier from the results generated by the simulation. This same concept has been brought to a user analysis step to allow the identification of best solutions across multiple evaluation workflows, lowering the expertise level for a solution.","PeriodicalId":306106,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214345-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work introduces an efficient workflow for AI-enhanced decision-making in Field Development Planning Optimization. Despite the clear importance of uncertainty quantification in decision-making, we find that constraints in time, hardware, and costs are often limiting factors during field evaluation, with the drawback of having a biased uncertainty description or a wrong risk perception. The proposed work encompasses history matching, solution analysis, and production optimization with special emphasis on reducing both simulation and processing time, maximizing what we can call the result per core hour. At the center of our work is an AI-guided optimizer suited to avoid excessive convergence bias and maintain an optimal exploration vs. exploitation performance. The optimizer allows the integration of a multi-objective (MO) formulation in standard history matching and optimization workflows. Despite the flexibility of MO optimization and the vast literature in the energy industry, its usage in real-field cases has always been quite limited due to its formulation availability in commercial software and the increased computation time. This work will show improvement in solution accuracy and formulation flexibility compared to Single Objective (SO) formulations at no increase in runtime. MO is based on the iterative convergence of an efficient frontier from the results generated by the simulation. This same concept has been brought to a user analysis step to allow the identification of best solutions across multiple evaluation workflows, lowering the expertise level for a solution.
人工智能增强决策的高效FDP优化
本文介绍了人工智能增强油田开发规划优化决策的高效工作流程。尽管不确定性量化在决策中具有明显的重要性,但我们发现,在现场评估中,时间、硬件和成本的约束往往是限制因素,其缺点是存在有偏见的不确定性描述或错误的风险感知。建议的工作包括历史匹配、解决方案分析和生产优化,特别强调减少模拟和处理时间,最大化我们所说的每核心小时的结果。我们工作的核心是一个人工智能引导的优化器,以避免过度的收敛偏差,并保持最佳的探索与开发性能。优化器允许在标准历史匹配和优化工作流程中集成多目标(MO)公式。尽管MO优化具有灵活性,并且在能源行业中有大量的文献,但由于其在商业软件中的公式可用性和计算时间的增加,其在实际应用中的应用一直非常有限。与单目标(SO)配方相比,这项工作将显示在不增加运行时间的情况下,溶液精度和配方灵活性得到改善。MO是基于仿真结果的有效边界的迭代收敛。同样的概念已经被引入到用户分析步骤中,以允许跨多个评估工作流识别最佳解决方案,降低解决方案的专业水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信