Volatility in Discrete and Continuous Time Models: A Survey with New Evidence on Large and Small Jumps

D. Duong, Norman R. Swanson
{"title":"Volatility in Discrete and Continuous Time Models: A Survey with New Evidence on Large and Small Jumps","authors":"D. Duong, Norman R. Swanson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1856079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of volatility measurement and estimation is central to financial and more generally time series econometrics. In this paper, we begin by surveying models of volatility, both discrete and continuous, and then we summarize some selected empirical …findings from the literature. In particular, in the first sections of this paper, we discuss important developments in volatility models, with focus on time varying and stochastic volatility as well as nonparametric volatility estimation. The models discussed share the common feature that volatilities are unobserved, and belong to the class of missing variables. We then provide empirical evidence on \"small\" and \"large\" jumps from the perspective of their contribution to overall realized variation, using high frequency price return data on 25 stocks in the DOW 30. Our \"small\" and \"large\" jump variations are constructed at three truncation levels, using extant methodology of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2006), Andersen, Bollerslev and Diebold (2007) and Aït-Sahalia and Jacod (2009a, b, c). Evidence of jumps is found in around 22.8% of the days during the 1993-2000 period, much higher than the corresponding …gure of 9.4% during the 2001-2008 period. While the overall role of jumps is lessening, the role of large jumps has not decreased, and indeed, the relative role of large jumps, as a proportion of overall jumps has actually increased in the 2000s.","PeriodicalId":418701,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Time-Series Models (Single) (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Time-Series Models (Single) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1856079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The topic of volatility measurement and estimation is central to financial and more generally time series econometrics. In this paper, we begin by surveying models of volatility, both discrete and continuous, and then we summarize some selected empirical …findings from the literature. In particular, in the first sections of this paper, we discuss important developments in volatility models, with focus on time varying and stochastic volatility as well as nonparametric volatility estimation. The models discussed share the common feature that volatilities are unobserved, and belong to the class of missing variables. We then provide empirical evidence on "small" and "large" jumps from the perspective of their contribution to overall realized variation, using high frequency price return data on 25 stocks in the DOW 30. Our "small" and "large" jump variations are constructed at three truncation levels, using extant methodology of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2006), Andersen, Bollerslev and Diebold (2007) and Aït-Sahalia and Jacod (2009a, b, c). Evidence of jumps is found in around 22.8% of the days during the 1993-2000 period, much higher than the corresponding …gure of 9.4% during the 2001-2008 period. While the overall role of jumps is lessening, the role of large jumps has not decreased, and indeed, the relative role of large jumps, as a proportion of overall jumps has actually increased in the 2000s.
离散和连续时间模型中的波动:关于大跳跃和小跳跃的新证据综述
波动率测量和估计的主题是金融和更普遍的时间序列计量经济学的核心。在本文中,我们首先考察了波动率的模型,包括离散模型和连续模型,然后总结了一些从文献中选择的实证研究结果。特别是,在本文的第一部分中,我们讨论了波动率模型的重要发展,重点是时变波动率和随机波动率以及非参数波动率估计。所讨论的模型有一个共同的特征,即波动性是不可观察的,并且属于缺失变量的类别。然后,我们利用道琼斯30指数中25只股票的高频价格回报数据,从它们对总体实现变化的贡献的角度,提供了“小”和“大”跳跃的经验证据。我们的“小”和“大”跳跃变化是在三个截断水平上构建的,使用了现有的方法,即Barndorff-Nielsen和Shephard (2006), Andersen, Bollerslev和Diebold(2007)以及Aït-Sahalia和Jacod (2009a, b, c)。在1993-2000年期间,大约22.8%的天发现了跳跃的证据,远高于2001-2008年期间相应的9.4%。虽然跳跃的整体作用正在减弱,但大跳跃的作用并没有减少,事实上,大跳跃的相对作用,作为整体跳跃的比例,在2000年代实际上有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信