Permutation-Based Residential Short-term Load Forecasting in the Context of Energy Management Optimization Objectives

M. Voss
{"title":"Permutation-Based Residential Short-term Load Forecasting in the Context of Energy Management Optimization Objectives","authors":"M. Voss","doi":"10.1145/3396851.3397731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What makes a household-level short-term load forecast \"good\"? Individual household load profiles are intermittent, as distinct peaks correspond to specific activities in the household. Using traditional point-wise error metrics to assess household-level forecasts may lead to, for instance, double-digit mean absolute percentage errors. One reason is a double penalty incurred if a peak is forecasted correctly in amplitude, but with a small delay in time. An adjusted forecast error measure based on local permutations was proposed to assess household-level forecasts by optimally aligning the peaks bounded by a displacement limit. This work shows how the choice of this parameter leads to different \"best\" forecasts in terms of specific applications, namely the optimization objectives of an energy management system. For that, different parameterizations of the Local Permutation Invariant (LPI) distance are compared within k-Nearest Neighbors as a forecasting model for three different optimization objectives. A simulation study on 100 households of the CER dataset shows that the optimal parameterization can decrease the peak load on average by over 22.5% compared to the Euclidean distance. However, for increasing self-sufficiency and minimizing costs, no significant improvements can be achieved. This implies that household-level forecasts should generally be evaluated in terms of their application, as traditional metrics as a proxy may not express its \"goodness\" adequately.","PeriodicalId":442966,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396851.3397731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

What makes a household-level short-term load forecast "good"? Individual household load profiles are intermittent, as distinct peaks correspond to specific activities in the household. Using traditional point-wise error metrics to assess household-level forecasts may lead to, for instance, double-digit mean absolute percentage errors. One reason is a double penalty incurred if a peak is forecasted correctly in amplitude, but with a small delay in time. An adjusted forecast error measure based on local permutations was proposed to assess household-level forecasts by optimally aligning the peaks bounded by a displacement limit. This work shows how the choice of this parameter leads to different "best" forecasts in terms of specific applications, namely the optimization objectives of an energy management system. For that, different parameterizations of the Local Permutation Invariant (LPI) distance are compared within k-Nearest Neighbors as a forecasting model for three different optimization objectives. A simulation study on 100 households of the CER dataset shows that the optimal parameterization can decrease the peak load on average by over 22.5% compared to the Euclidean distance. However, for increasing self-sufficiency and minimizing costs, no significant improvements can be achieved. This implies that household-level forecasts should generally be evaluated in terms of their application, as traditional metrics as a proxy may not express its "goodness" adequately.
能源管理优化目标下基于置换的住宅短期负荷预测
是什么让家庭层面的短期负荷预测“好”?个别家庭负荷概况是间歇性的,因为不同的峰值对应于家庭中的特定活动。例如,使用传统的逐点误差度量来评估家庭水平的预测可能会导致平均绝对百分比误差达到两位数。一个原因是,如果峰值在振幅上预测正确,但在时间上有小延迟,则会产生双重惩罚。提出了一种基于局部排列的调整后的预测误差度量,通过最优对齐以位移限制为界的峰值来评估住户级预测。这项工作表明,根据具体应用,即能源管理系统的优化目标,该参数的选择如何导致不同的“最佳”预测。为此,比较了局部置换不变量(LPI)距离的不同参数化在k近邻内作为三种不同优化目标的预测模型。对100户CER数据集的模拟研究表明,与欧氏距离相比,最优参数化可使峰值负荷平均降低22.5%以上。然而,在增加自给自足和尽量减少费用方面,没有取得重大进展。这意味着,家庭层面的预测通常应根据其应用进行评估,因为作为代理的传统指标可能无法充分表达其“优点”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信