Language Learning Strategy Used by Nursing Academy Students in Learning English

Nanda Rosi Parera
{"title":"Language Learning Strategy Used by Nursing Academy Students in Learning English","authors":"Nanda Rosi Parera","doi":"10.22437/langue.v1i1.22553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this research were to describe the language learning strategies used by nursing academy students in learning English and to describe the classification of language learning strategies used by higher and lower score students in learning English. A questionnaire was used as the instrument for this research. The participants of this research were 57 students of the nursing academy (AKPER Bina Insani Sakti Sungai Penuh). The researcher used the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) by Oxford (1990) to determine the student’s language learning strategy. The result revealed that the students used all strategies (memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social), which were categorized as high and medium. The highest mean value was Metacognitive strategies (3.64). The higher scores of nursing academy students also used all six learning strategies, with the highest mean values referring to Metacognitive and Social strategies (4.10). On the other hand, the lower score students sometimes used and generally did not use the learning strategies in their learning activities. which is shown with the highest mean value was the memory strategy (3.02). As a result, it is simply categorized as medium strategy employed by students.","PeriodicalId":325656,"journal":{"name":"Langue (Journal of Language and Education)","volume":"486 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langue (Journal of Language and Education)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/langue.v1i1.22553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to describe the language learning strategies used by nursing academy students in learning English and to describe the classification of language learning strategies used by higher and lower score students in learning English. A questionnaire was used as the instrument for this research. The participants of this research were 57 students of the nursing academy (AKPER Bina Insani Sakti Sungai Penuh). The researcher used the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) by Oxford (1990) to determine the student’s language learning strategy. The result revealed that the students used all strategies (memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social), which were categorized as high and medium. The highest mean value was Metacognitive strategies (3.64). The higher scores of nursing academy students also used all six learning strategies, with the highest mean values referring to Metacognitive and Social strategies (4.10). On the other hand, the lower score students sometimes used and generally did not use the learning strategies in their learning activities. which is shown with the highest mean value was the memory strategy (3.02). As a result, it is simply categorized as medium strategy employed by students.
护理学院学生在英语学习中的语言学习策略
本研究的目的是描述护理学院学生在英语学习中使用的语言学习策略,以及描述高、低分学生在英语学习中使用的语言学习策略的分类。本研究采用问卷调查作为研究工具。本研究的参与者是护理学院(AKPER Bina Insani Sakti Sungai Penuh)的57名学生。研究者使用牛津大学(1990)的语言学习策略量表(strategic Inventory for Language Learning, SILL)来确定学生的语言学习策略。结果显示,学生使用了所有策略(记忆、认知、补偿、元认知、情感和社会),这些策略被分为高和中等。元认知策略的平均值最高,为3.64。得分较高的护理学院学生也使用了所有六种学习策略,其中元认知和社会策略的平均值最高(4.10)。另一方面,分数较低的学生在学习活动中有时会使用或通常不会使用这些学习策略。其中均值最高的是记忆策略(3.02)。因此,它被简单地归类为学生使用的媒介策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信