A Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Methods in Automated Classification of White Blood Cell Images

H. A. Muhamad, S. Kareem, A. Mohammed
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Methods in Automated Classification of White Blood Cell Images","authors":"H. A. Muhamad, S. Kareem, A. Mohammed","doi":"10.1109/IEC54822.2022.9807456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The identification and characterization of a patient’s blood sample are required for the diagnosis of blood-related disorders. As a result, the medical implications of automated methods for identifying and categorizing various kinds of blood cells are considerable. However, deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) and standard machine learning algorithms have performed well in the categorization of blood cell pictures. Red, White, and Platelets are all types of blood cells. Leucocyte, commonly known as the immune cell, is a type of blood cell that plays a vital part in human immune function. Depending on shape info and granulated data in leukocytes, white blood cells are usually split by hematologists into two different categories: non-granular cells (lymphocytes and monocytes) and granular cells (eosinophils, basophils, and neutrophils). The CNN portion receives the pre-trained weight parameters from the image dataset using the transfer learning approach. Also, We have used two different scenarios, the first scenario of using CNN directly gave us pictures. used SVM in the second scenario. Then we compare the best category results. The classification results demonstrated that the accuracy of CNN is 98.4 %, whereas the accuracy of Support Vector Machine (SVM) is 90.6 %. Other classifiers can be added to the suggested system to improve its performance.","PeriodicalId":265954,"journal":{"name":"2022 8th International Engineering Conference on Sustainable Technology and Development (IEC)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 8th International Engineering Conference on Sustainable Technology and Development (IEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEC54822.2022.9807456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The identification and characterization of a patient’s blood sample are required for the diagnosis of blood-related disorders. As a result, the medical implications of automated methods for identifying and categorizing various kinds of blood cells are considerable. However, deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) and standard machine learning algorithms have performed well in the categorization of blood cell pictures. Red, White, and Platelets are all types of blood cells. Leucocyte, commonly known as the immune cell, is a type of blood cell that plays a vital part in human immune function. Depending on shape info and granulated data in leukocytes, white blood cells are usually split by hematologists into two different categories: non-granular cells (lymphocytes and monocytes) and granular cells (eosinophils, basophils, and neutrophils). The CNN portion receives the pre-trained weight parameters from the image dataset using the transfer learning approach. Also, We have used two different scenarios, the first scenario of using CNN directly gave us pictures. used SVM in the second scenario. Then we compare the best category results. The classification results demonstrated that the accuracy of CNN is 98.4 %, whereas the accuracy of Support Vector Machine (SVM) is 90.6 %. Other classifiers can be added to the suggested system to improve its performance.
白细胞图像自动分类中深度学习方法的比较评价
血液相关疾病的诊断需要患者血液样本的鉴定和特征。因此,用于识别和分类各种血细胞的自动化方法的医学意义是相当大的。然而,深度卷积神经网络(CNN)和标准机器学习算法在血细胞图像分类方面表现良好。红细胞、白细胞和血小板都是不同类型的血细胞。白细胞,俗称免疫细胞,是一种血细胞,在人体免疫功能中起着至关重要的作用。根据白细胞的形状信息和颗粒数据,血液学家通常将白细胞分为两类:非颗粒细胞(淋巴细胞和单核细胞)和颗粒细胞(嗜酸性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞和中性粒细胞)。CNN部分使用迁移学习方法从图像数据集中接收预训练的权重参数。另外,我们使用了两种不同的场景,第一种场景是使用CNN直接给我们图片。在第二个场景中使用SVM。然后我们比较最好的分类结果。分类结果表明,CNN的准确率为98.4%,而支持向量机(SVM)的准确率为90.6%。可以将其他分类器添加到建议的系统中以提高其性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信