Introduction to the Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance: the field of democratic innovation

O. Escobar, S. Elstub
{"title":"Introduction to the Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance: the field of democratic innovation","authors":"O. Escobar, S. Elstub","doi":"10.4337/9781786433862.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to this Handbook! You have in your hands the work of 60 authors brought together to offer a comprehensive overview of the field of democratic innovation across the globe. This introductory chapter places the Handbook in context, reflects on what the field has to offer, and outlines the key themes explored in six sections featuring 38 chapters. We live in a time where the ideal of democracy is widely loved, but its practices are broadly criticised. Studies often highlight democratic deficits and the proliferation of a democratic malaise, while there is a growing debate about whether we are entering a period of global democratic recession (Diamond, 2015; Levitsky and Way, 2015). In the last decade there has been a reduction in the number of democratic systems, and established democracies are under increasing pressure due to social, political, environmental and economic factors (Wike and Fetterolf, 2018). Moreover, the gap between the ‘politically rich’ and the ‘politically poor’ is widening in societies across the world (Dalton, 2017). A sobering overview was provided by the 2016 Democracy Index, where the global average score fell, with 72 countries dropping in the ranking from 2015, and just 38 moving up (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2016: 3–6). The number of ‘full democracies’ dropped from 20 to 19, with the US now classed as ‘flawed’. Near half the world’s population (49.3%) live currently in a democracy of some kind, but only 4.5% of people live in a ‘full democracy’ – half as many than in 2015 (ibid). The 2018 Democracy Index, in turn, indicates that growing disillusionment with democratic institutions is accompanied by growing political participation as people are ‘turning anger into action’ (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2018: 4). Recent waves of the World Values Survey suggest increased frustration and authoritarian attitudes, with striking rises amongst the youngest populations of democratic systems around the world (Foa and Mounk, 2016). Although democratic principles still enjoy support, current practices and institutions evoke cynicism: people love democracy, but often despair at how it is practiced. In this context, the field of democratic innovation is growing, in part, to counter the democratic recession. This has interesting parallels with debates that emerged a century ago during arguably the first contemporary wave of democratic innovation. Although debates about participatory democracy, more broadly, can be traced back to Athenian democracy, the narratives about innovation that occupy this Handbook were shaped in the past century1 (Escobar, 2017b). For example, John Dewey was a strong critic of the ‘democratic elitism’ that underpins mainstream narratives of representative democracy (Bernstein, 2010: 74). Dewey saw elitism as central to the demise of democracy and the advance of elite-driven populism and totalitarian regimes. This quote from 1937 remains topical today:","PeriodicalId":269891,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433862.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Welcome to this Handbook! You have in your hands the work of 60 authors brought together to offer a comprehensive overview of the field of democratic innovation across the globe. This introductory chapter places the Handbook in context, reflects on what the field has to offer, and outlines the key themes explored in six sections featuring 38 chapters. We live in a time where the ideal of democracy is widely loved, but its practices are broadly criticised. Studies often highlight democratic deficits and the proliferation of a democratic malaise, while there is a growing debate about whether we are entering a period of global democratic recession (Diamond, 2015; Levitsky and Way, 2015). In the last decade there has been a reduction in the number of democratic systems, and established democracies are under increasing pressure due to social, political, environmental and economic factors (Wike and Fetterolf, 2018). Moreover, the gap between the ‘politically rich’ and the ‘politically poor’ is widening in societies across the world (Dalton, 2017). A sobering overview was provided by the 2016 Democracy Index, where the global average score fell, with 72 countries dropping in the ranking from 2015, and just 38 moving up (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2016: 3–6). The number of ‘full democracies’ dropped from 20 to 19, with the US now classed as ‘flawed’. Near half the world’s population (49.3%) live currently in a democracy of some kind, but only 4.5% of people live in a ‘full democracy’ – half as many than in 2015 (ibid). The 2018 Democracy Index, in turn, indicates that growing disillusionment with democratic institutions is accompanied by growing political participation as people are ‘turning anger into action’ (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2018: 4). Recent waves of the World Values Survey suggest increased frustration and authoritarian attitudes, with striking rises amongst the youngest populations of democratic systems around the world (Foa and Mounk, 2016). Although democratic principles still enjoy support, current practices and institutions evoke cynicism: people love democracy, but often despair at how it is practiced. In this context, the field of democratic innovation is growing, in part, to counter the democratic recession. This has interesting parallels with debates that emerged a century ago during arguably the first contemporary wave of democratic innovation. Although debates about participatory democracy, more broadly, can be traced back to Athenian democracy, the narratives about innovation that occupy this Handbook were shaped in the past century1 (Escobar, 2017b). For example, John Dewey was a strong critic of the ‘democratic elitism’ that underpins mainstream narratives of representative democracy (Bernstein, 2010: 74). Dewey saw elitism as central to the demise of democracy and the advance of elite-driven populism and totalitarian regimes. This quote from 1937 remains topical today:
《民主创新与治理手册》导论:民主创新领域
欢迎阅读本手册!你们手中有60位作者的著作,汇集在一起,对全球民主创新领域进行了全面概述。这一导论章节将手册置于背景中,反映了该领域所提供的内容,并概述了六个部分中38章所探讨的关键主题。在我们生活的时代,民主的理想广受爱戴,但其实践却广受批评。研究经常强调民主赤字和民主萎靡的扩散,而关于我们是否正在进入全球民主衰退时期的争论越来越多(Diamond, 2015;Levitsky and Way, 2015)。在过去十年中,民主制度的数量减少了,由于社会、政治、环境和经济因素,已建立的民主国家面临越来越大的压力(Wike和Fetterolf, 2018)。此外,在世界各地的社会中,“政治富人”和“政治穷人”之间的差距正在扩大(道尔顿,2017)。2016年民主指数的全球平均得分有所下降,与2015年相比有72个国家排名下降,只有38个国家排名上升(经济学人智库,2016:3-6)。“完全民主国家”的数量从20个下降到19个,美国现在被归为“有缺陷的”。近一半的世界人口(49.3%)目前生活在某种程度的民主中,但只有4.5%的人生活在“完全民主”中——比2015年减少了一半(同上)。反过来,2018年民主指数表明,随着人们“将愤怒转化为行动”,对民主制度的幻灭日益加剧,政治参与也越来越多(《经济学人智库》,2018年:4)。最近一波世界价值观调查表明,沮丧情绪和威权态度有所增加,世界各地民主制度下最年轻的人口数量显著上升(Foa和Mounk, 2016)。尽管民主原则仍然受到支持,但目前的做法和制度却引起了人们的冷嘲热讽:人们热爱民主,但往往对民主的实施方式感到绝望。在这种背景下,民主创新领域正在发展,部分原因是为了对抗民主衰退。这与一个世纪前出现的辩论有着有趣的相似之处,当时可以说是当代第一波民主创新浪潮。尽管更广泛地说,关于参与式民主的辩论可以追溯到雅典民主,但本手册中关于创新的叙述是在过去一个世纪形成的1 (Escobar, 2017b)。例如,约翰·杜威强烈批评支撑代议制民主主流叙事的“民主精英主义”(Bernstein, 2010: 74)。杜威认为精英主义是民主消亡和精英驱动的民粹主义和极权主义政权发展的核心。1937年的这句话至今仍是热门话题:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信