Pohdintoja ihmisoikeuksien universaalisuuden rajallisuudesta

Binga Tupamäki
{"title":"Pohdintoja ihmisoikeuksien universaalisuuden rajallisuudesta","authors":"Binga Tupamäki","doi":"10.33344/vol16iss1pp54-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human rights are the most universally accepted set of norms that have ever existed. Thus, finding a person or community that would deny their fundamental importance to our society is not easy. According to some views, we live in a global revolution of rights, where fundamental rights are a central part of all political discussions. The dilemma of the universality of human rights holds various aspects, of which this article identifies four. The first and most challenging question is how to justify the fact that human rights universally bind everyone. This must be kept separate from the second, much more practical question of how human rights can be applied universally. Thirdly, the politicization of human rights can be considered an obstacle to universal principles as politics are typically dependent on momentary issues. Fourth, one must consider the inadequacy of human rights in their current form and how human rights fail to solve some of the critical problems they were created to solve. The article's main objective is to go through the challenges of universality at a general level. The purpose of this article is not to offer a certain kind of solution to a specific debate but to map what kind of limitations come into question when considering the universality of human rights.","PeriodicalId":215987,"journal":{"name":"Helsinki Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helsinki Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33344/vol16iss1pp54-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human rights are the most universally accepted set of norms that have ever existed. Thus, finding a person or community that would deny their fundamental importance to our society is not easy. According to some views, we live in a global revolution of rights, where fundamental rights are a central part of all political discussions. The dilemma of the universality of human rights holds various aspects, of which this article identifies four. The first and most challenging question is how to justify the fact that human rights universally bind everyone. This must be kept separate from the second, much more practical question of how human rights can be applied universally. Thirdly, the politicization of human rights can be considered an obstacle to universal principles as politics are typically dependent on momentary issues. Fourth, one must consider the inadequacy of human rights in their current form and how human rights fail to solve some of the critical problems they were created to solve. The article's main objective is to go through the challenges of universality at a general level. The purpose of this article is not to offer a certain kind of solution to a specific debate but to map what kind of limitations come into question when considering the universality of human rights.
人权是有史以来最被普遍接受的一套准则。因此,要找到一个人或团体否认他们对我们社会的根本重要性是不容易的。根据一些观点,我们生活在一场全球权利革命中,基本权利是所有政治讨论的中心部分。人权普遍性的困境包含了多个方面,本文认为有四个方面。第一个也是最具挑战性的问题是,如何证明人权普遍约束每个人这一事实是正当的。这个问题必须与第二个更为实际的问题分开,即如何普遍适用人权。第三,人权政治化可被视为普遍原则的障碍,因为政治通常取决于一时的问题。第四,人们必须考虑目前形式的人权的不足之处,以及人权如何未能解决创立人权是为了解决的一些关键问题。本文的主要目的是在一般层面上探讨普遍性的挑战。本文的目的不是为某一具体辩论提供某种解决办法,而是说明在考虑人权的普遍性时,哪些限制会成为问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信