Students’ Perceptions of Workshop Based Introductory Macroeconomics Tutorials: A Survey

Ameeta Jain
{"title":"Students’ Perceptions of Workshop Based Introductory Macroeconomics Tutorials: A Survey","authors":"Ameeta Jain","doi":"10.1111/J.1759-3441.2006.TB00398.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The declining popularity of Economics courses, evident in the last decade, has fueled a debate on the nature of Economics units and the way in which they are taught in tertiary institutions. The effectiveness of traditional teaching methods has been questioned as lecturers search for alternative ways of presenting material and engaging students. In recent times, workshop-based/cooperative tutorials have become more popular in promoting deeper learning. This paper assesses the application of such an approach at a large tertiary institution. It evaluates student perceptions of this tutorial method in an Introductory Macroeconomics first-year unit. An anonymous questionnaire was used. Whilst the sample size is small (n = 56), the results are important in that this is the first such study in Macroeconomics. Students found workshop-based tutorials useful, preferred them over lecture style tutorials, and found that they fostered inclusivity. The importance of tutorials per se, is reiterated. Students state that tutorials are an important adjunct to lectures. This study also looks at students’ study habits: finding that on average they spend less than one hour per week studying Economics and most prepare only occasionally for tutorials. The sample studied indicates that there are notable differences in the perceptions of tutorials and teaching methods between the genders and between local and international students. This may impact on the way in which tutorials are conducted effectively.","PeriodicalId":158767,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Other Social Sciences Education (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Other Social Sciences Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1759-3441.2006.TB00398.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The declining popularity of Economics courses, evident in the last decade, has fueled a debate on the nature of Economics units and the way in which they are taught in tertiary institutions. The effectiveness of traditional teaching methods has been questioned as lecturers search for alternative ways of presenting material and engaging students. In recent times, workshop-based/cooperative tutorials have become more popular in promoting deeper learning. This paper assesses the application of such an approach at a large tertiary institution. It evaluates student perceptions of this tutorial method in an Introductory Macroeconomics first-year unit. An anonymous questionnaire was used. Whilst the sample size is small (n = 56), the results are important in that this is the first such study in Macroeconomics. Students found workshop-based tutorials useful, preferred them over lecture style tutorials, and found that they fostered inclusivity. The importance of tutorials per se, is reiterated. Students state that tutorials are an important adjunct to lectures. This study also looks at students’ study habits: finding that on average they spend less than one hour per week studying Economics and most prepare only occasionally for tutorials. The sample studied indicates that there are notable differences in the perceptions of tutorials and teaching methods between the genders and between local and international students. This may impact on the way in which tutorials are conducted effectively.
学生对以工作坊为基础的宏观经济学入门教程的看法:一项调查
在过去十年中,经济学课程的受欢迎程度明显下降,这引发了一场关于经济学单元性质和高等院校经济学教学方式的辩论。传统教学方法的有效性受到质疑,因为讲师们正在寻找其他的方式来展示材料和吸引学生。最近,基于工作坊/合作的教程在促进深度学习方面变得越来越流行。本文评估了这种方法在一所大型高等教育机构的应用。它评估了学生在宏观经济学入门一年级单元中对这种指导方法的看法。采用了匿名调查问卷。虽然样本量很小(n = 56),但结果很重要,因为这是宏观经济学中第一次这样的研究。学生们发现以研讨会为基础的教程很有用,比起讲座式的教程更喜欢它们,并且发现它们培养了包容性。教程本身的重要性得到了重申。学生们说辅导课是课堂的重要补充。这项研究还关注了学生的学习习惯:发现他们平均每周花不到一个小时学习经济学,大多数人只是偶尔准备辅导课。研究样本表明,不同性别、本地学生与国际学生对辅导课和教学方法的认知存在显著差异。这可能会影响教程的有效实施方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信