Story and Emotion in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov

Per Thomas Andersen
{"title":"Story and Emotion in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov","authors":"Per Thomas Andersen","doi":"10.18261/9788215028255-2016-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research and dissemination of Dostoevsky’s work has been dominated by interest in the ideological aspects of his authorship. This is especially the case for his masterpiece The Brothers Karamazov (1880). In his monumental Dostoevsky. The Mantle of the Prophet 1871–1881 (2002), Joseph Frank, for example, writes that “Indeed this work towers even over his earlier masterpieces, and succeeds in achieving a classical expression of the great theme that had preoccupied him since Notes from the Underground: the conflict between reason and Christian faith” (Frank 2002, 567). This is evident too from Dostoevsky’s own self-understanding of and participation in his era, as it is expressed, for example, in his magazine Vremja and in Diary of a Writer. The conflict between ideas, ideologies and philosophies of life is central to all of Dostoevsky’s great novels. One has only to think of the contrast between Raskolnikov and Sonya in Crime and Punishment, the contrast between Myshkin and Rogozhin in The Idiot, or between Alyosha, Mitya and Ivan in The Brothers Karamazov. Still, it is surprising that the affective aspect has not played a larger role in the reception of Dostoevsky’s work. Deborah A. Martinsen’s book Surprised by Shame. Dostoevsky’s Liars and Narrative Exposure (2003), in which the study of shame plays a decisive roll, is an interesting exception. To my understanding, Dostoevsky is an author who in long passages in the course of the plot writes from one affect to the next, to the same extent that he writes from event to event. The affects are often the very incentives for the epic events, they are almost always unusually powerful, and the shift between different affects are possibly just as important happenings in the story as the outer events are. The affects often have as much of a meaning for the incidents as the incidents have on the affects. An indication of this focus on affects in The Brothers Karamazov comes as early as the opening discussion of the central father figure Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov’s first wife. The narrator wants to explain why a rich, beautiful and intelligent girl could decide to marry such an insignificant fellow and “illnatured buffoon” as Fyodor Pavlovich (Dostoevsky 1976, 3).9 The explanation is “romantic” inclinations, and in this connection the narrator refers to another","PeriodicalId":419758,"journal":{"name":"Story and Emotion","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Story and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215028255-2016-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research and dissemination of Dostoevsky’s work has been dominated by interest in the ideological aspects of his authorship. This is especially the case for his masterpiece The Brothers Karamazov (1880). In his monumental Dostoevsky. The Mantle of the Prophet 1871–1881 (2002), Joseph Frank, for example, writes that “Indeed this work towers even over his earlier masterpieces, and succeeds in achieving a classical expression of the great theme that had preoccupied him since Notes from the Underground: the conflict between reason and Christian faith” (Frank 2002, 567). This is evident too from Dostoevsky’s own self-understanding of and participation in his era, as it is expressed, for example, in his magazine Vremja and in Diary of a Writer. The conflict between ideas, ideologies and philosophies of life is central to all of Dostoevsky’s great novels. One has only to think of the contrast between Raskolnikov and Sonya in Crime and Punishment, the contrast between Myshkin and Rogozhin in The Idiot, or between Alyosha, Mitya and Ivan in The Brothers Karamazov. Still, it is surprising that the affective aspect has not played a larger role in the reception of Dostoevsky’s work. Deborah A. Martinsen’s book Surprised by Shame. Dostoevsky’s Liars and Narrative Exposure (2003), in which the study of shame plays a decisive roll, is an interesting exception. To my understanding, Dostoevsky is an author who in long passages in the course of the plot writes from one affect to the next, to the same extent that he writes from event to event. The affects are often the very incentives for the epic events, they are almost always unusually powerful, and the shift between different affects are possibly just as important happenings in the story as the outer events are. The affects often have as much of a meaning for the incidents as the incidents have on the affects. An indication of this focus on affects in The Brothers Karamazov comes as early as the opening discussion of the central father figure Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov’s first wife. The narrator wants to explain why a rich, beautiful and intelligent girl could decide to marry such an insignificant fellow and “illnatured buffoon” as Fyodor Pavlovich (Dostoevsky 1976, 3).9 The explanation is “romantic” inclinations, and in this connection the narrator refers to another
陀思妥耶夫斯基《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中的故事与情感
陀思妥耶夫斯基作品的研究和传播主要是对其作者的意识形态方面的兴趣。他的杰作《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》(1880)尤其如此。在他不朽的陀思妥耶夫斯基中。例如,约瑟夫·弗兰克在《先知的披风1871-1881》(2002)中写道:“事实上,这部作品甚至超过了他早期的杰作,成功地实现了一个伟大主题的经典表达,这个主题自《地下笔记》以来一直困扰着他:理性与基督教信仰之间的冲突”(弗兰克2002,567)。陀思妥耶夫斯基对他所处时代的自我理解和参与也体现了这一点,例如,他的杂志《Vremja》和《作家日记》就表达了这一点。思想、意识形态和人生哲学之间的冲突是陀思妥耶夫斯基所有伟大小说的核心。只要想想《罪与罚》中拉斯柯尔尼科夫和索尼娅的对比,《白痴》中梅什金和罗戈津的对比,或者《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中阿廖沙、米蒂亚和伊万的对比就知道了。然而,令人惊讶的是,情感方面并没有在接受陀思妥耶夫斯基的作品中发挥更大的作用。黛博拉·a·马丁森的书《羞耻的惊喜》陀思妥耶夫斯基的《说谎者与叙事暴露》(2003)是一个有趣的例外,其中对羞耻的研究起着决定性的作用。在我看来,陀思妥耶夫斯基是这样一位作家,他在冗长的段落中从一种情感描写到另一种情感,就像他从一个事件描写到另一个事件一样。情感通常是史诗事件的动机,它们几乎总是异常强大,不同情感之间的转换可能与外部事件一样重要。影响对事件的意义就像事件对影响的意义一样。在《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中,这种对情感的关注早在开篇就出现了,开篇就讨论了主角父亲费奥多尔·帕夫洛维奇·卡拉马佐夫的第一任妻子。叙述者想要解释为什么一个富有、美丽、聪明的女孩会决定嫁给费奥多尔·帕夫洛维奇这样一个无足轻重的家伙和“邪恶的小丑”(陀思妥耶夫斯基1976,3)解释是“浪漫”倾向,在这一点上,叙述者指的是另一个人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信