African Intellectual History

S. Adejumobi
{"title":"African Intellectual History","authors":"S. Adejumobi","doi":"10.1080/15615324.2003.10427198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st have been dominated by major questions surrounding the assumptions of two grand narratives — the liberal faith in progress, modernization and the bureaucratic state, and the conservative faith in free trade, deregulation and the free market. In this regard, African cultural and intellectual history as part of the global historical discourse of continuity and change has yet to be fully appreciated in spite of the fact that the collapse of state structures in many parts of Africa at the end of the 20th century brought into fore questions of authority, political legitimacy and social change. Intellectual and cultural life in Africa in the last 250 years could not escape the political, economic and social constraints of the “international encounter” of African and non-African powers, economies, social practices and cultures. An engaged and yet self-critical intellectual history must therefore also continually engage in the interpretation of seemingly nonintellectual factors but factors which nonetheless shaped and called for intellectual expression. This alone can help the history of African social and political ideas escape racialized preconceptions which can be summed up in terms of the Hegelian notion of a “peoples without history”, because their history cannot easily supplant or compete with the predominant narratives of the emergence of western self-identity.","PeriodicalId":360014,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual News","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15615324.2003.10427198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st have been dominated by major questions surrounding the assumptions of two grand narratives — the liberal faith in progress, modernization and the bureaucratic state, and the conservative faith in free trade, deregulation and the free market. In this regard, African cultural and intellectual history as part of the global historical discourse of continuity and change has yet to be fully appreciated in spite of the fact that the collapse of state structures in many parts of Africa at the end of the 20th century brought into fore questions of authority, political legitimacy and social change. Intellectual and cultural life in Africa in the last 250 years could not escape the political, economic and social constraints of the “international encounter” of African and non-African powers, economies, social practices and cultures. An engaged and yet self-critical intellectual history must therefore also continually engage in the interpretation of seemingly nonintellectual factors but factors which nonetheless shaped and called for intellectual expression. This alone can help the history of African social and political ideas escape racialized preconceptions which can be summed up in terms of the Hegelian notion of a “peoples without history”, because their history cannot easily supplant or compete with the predominant narratives of the emergence of western self-identity.
非洲思想史
20世纪末和21世纪初,围绕两大叙事假设的主要问题一直占据着主导地位——自由主义信仰进步、现代化和官僚国家,保守主义信仰自由贸易、放松管制和自由市场。在这方面,非洲文化和思想史作为连续性和变化的全球历史话语的一部分尚未得到充分认识,尽管20世纪末非洲许多地区国家结构的崩溃使权威、政治合法性和社会变革的问题成为重要问题。在过去的250年里,非洲的知识和文化生活无法摆脱非洲和非非洲大国、经济、社会实践和文化的“国际接触”所带来的政治、经济和社会限制。因此,一个积极而又自我批判的思想史也必须不断地参与对看似非智力因素的解释,但这些因素却塑造并要求智力表达。仅这一点就可以帮助非洲社会和政治思想的历史摆脱种族化的先入之见,这些先入之见可以用黑格尔的“没有历史的民族”的概念来概括,因为他们的历史不能轻易取代或与西方自我认同出现的主要叙述相竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信