{"title":"A comparison between hybrid methods for open-boundary problems","authors":"G. Aiello, S. Alfonzetti, S. Rizzo, N. Salerno","doi":"10.1109/CEFC.2010.5481471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the hybrid FEM-BEM and FEM-DBCI methods for the solution of open-boundary electrostatic field problems. Both methods couple a differential equation for the interior problem with an integral equation for the exterior one. The comparison shows that FEM-BEM is more accurate than FEM-DBCI but requires more computing time.","PeriodicalId":148739,"journal":{"name":"Digests of the 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digests of the 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEFC.2010.5481471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper compares the hybrid FEM-BEM and FEM-DBCI methods for the solution of open-boundary electrostatic field problems. Both methods couple a differential equation for the interior problem with an integral equation for the exterior one. The comparison shows that FEM-BEM is more accurate than FEM-DBCI but requires more computing time.