Faculty Perceptions of Readiness to Implement Interprofessional Education in Athletic Training

M. Parry, Jennifer Jordan Utley, Sue Shapiro, Stefanie Podlog
{"title":"Faculty Perceptions of Readiness to Implement Interprofessional Education in Athletic Training","authors":"M. Parry, Jennifer Jordan Utley, Sue Shapiro, Stefanie Podlog","doi":"10.7710/1182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE As the athletic training profession advances, master’s degree accreditation standards aim to position athletic trainers as key players on interprofessional healthcare teams. Interprofessional education standards were recently introduced to academic leaders as key elements in the professional healthcare education of athletic trainers. While the current standards reflect essential skills for entry-level clinicians, faculty instructing these elements may require additional development. METHODS The objective of this study was to explore athletic training educators’ perceptions of interprofessional education and to examine perceived barriers related to the implementation of IPE in athletic training curricula. An electronic survey was administered to a stratified, random sample of 1000 athletic training education program faculty from the National Athletic Trainer’s Association (NATA) member database. Participating faculty completed the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) and a set of additional Likert-scale questions regarding barriers to implementation of IPE in athletic training education. RESULTS The results indicated that differences exist in faculty readiness to implement IPE based on faculty rank or role, years of teaching experience, prior experience and skill level using IPE, and geographical location of the athletic training program within the institution. CONCLUSION The results indicated that differences exist in faculty readiness to implement IPE based on faculty rank or role, years of teaching experience, prior experience and skill level using IPE, and geographical location of the athletic training program within the institution. Together, the findings suggest that IPE integration should include initiatives that provide administrative support, delineate leadership roles, offer formal IP development, and aim to create closer physical proximity among healthcare disciplines on campuses.","PeriodicalId":320540,"journal":{"name":"Health, Interprofessional Practice and Education","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health, Interprofessional Practice and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7710/1182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE As the athletic training profession advances, master’s degree accreditation standards aim to position athletic trainers as key players on interprofessional healthcare teams. Interprofessional education standards were recently introduced to academic leaders as key elements in the professional healthcare education of athletic trainers. While the current standards reflect essential skills for entry-level clinicians, faculty instructing these elements may require additional development. METHODS The objective of this study was to explore athletic training educators’ perceptions of interprofessional education and to examine perceived barriers related to the implementation of IPE in athletic training curricula. An electronic survey was administered to a stratified, random sample of 1000 athletic training education program faculty from the National Athletic Trainer’s Association (NATA) member database. Participating faculty completed the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) and a set of additional Likert-scale questions regarding barriers to implementation of IPE in athletic training education. RESULTS The results indicated that differences exist in faculty readiness to implement IPE based on faculty rank or role, years of teaching experience, prior experience and skill level using IPE, and geographical location of the athletic training program within the institution. CONCLUSION The results indicated that differences exist in faculty readiness to implement IPE based on faculty rank or role, years of teaching experience, prior experience and skill level using IPE, and geographical location of the athletic training program within the institution. Together, the findings suggest that IPE integration should include initiatives that provide administrative support, delineate leadership roles, offer formal IP development, and aim to create closer physical proximity among healthcare disciplines on campuses.
教师对在运动训练中实施跨专业教育的准备程度的看法
随着运动训练专业的发展,硕士学位认证标准旨在将运动训练师定位为跨专业医疗团队的关键人物。跨专业教育标准最近被介绍给学术领袖,作为运动教练专业保健教育的关键要素。虽然目前的标准反映了初级临床医生的基本技能,但指导这些要素的教师可能需要额外的发展。方法本研究旨在探讨运动训练教育者对跨专业教育的认知,并检视在运动训练课程中实施IPE的认知障碍。一项电子调查被管理到一个分层,随机抽样1000名运动训练教育计划的教师从国家运动教练协会(NATA)的成员数据库。参与的教师完成了跨学科教育感知量表(IEPS)和一组关于在运动训练教育中实施IPE的障碍的附加李克特量表问题。结果结果表明,教师在实施IPE方面的准备程度存在差异,这取决于教师的级别或角色、教学经验的年数、先前使用IPE的经验和技能水平,以及机构内运动训练项目的地理位置。结论:根据教师级别或角色、教学年限、先前使用IPE的经验和技能水平以及学校内运动训练项目的地理位置,教师实施IPE的意愿存在差异。综上所述,研究结果表明,IPE整合应包括提供行政支持、界定领导角色、提供正式的知识产权开发以及旨在在校园医疗保健学科之间建立更紧密的物理联系的举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信