Slave Trade Syndicates: Contestation of Slavery in Timor between Local Rulers, Europeans, and Pirates in the 19th century

Fanada Sholihah, Y. Rochwulaningsih, S. T. Sulistiyono
{"title":"Slave Trade Syndicates: Contestation of Slavery in Timor between Local Rulers, Europeans, and Pirates in the 19th century","authors":"Fanada Sholihah, Y. Rochwulaningsih, S. T. Sulistiyono","doi":"10.14710/JMSNI.V3I1.5294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the contestation of slavery activities in Timor during 19th  century. The slave trade cannot be separated from contestation between three forces, namely the local authority (rajah), colonial entities residing in Timor, and pirates from Bugis, Ende, and Sulu.  The rajah fought each other on the battlefield to decide which of them worthy of a “gift” of the war, which were women and children as merchandise for sale. Meanwhile, colonial complaints about the limited human labor to be employed in various types of work not only encouraged increased slave raiding and the purchase of slaves in distant places, but at the same time fostered slave trading activities, both were sponsored by the Dutch and Portuguese. One of the main causes of the ongoing slave trade was piracy at sea, three actors were pioneering slave raiding, namely Balanini/Ilanun, Bugis and Makassar pirate, and Ende pirate. By applying historical method, this research questioned why locals, Europeans, and pirate rulers contested to obtain slaves in Timor? The rise of capitalism was marked by the demand for cheap labor in 19th century. Therefore, slave commodities were mobilized to meet the need for labour in plantations or companies owned by the colonial government.","PeriodicalId":114997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/JMSNI.V3I1.5294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the contestation of slavery activities in Timor during 19th  century. The slave trade cannot be separated from contestation between three forces, namely the local authority (rajah), colonial entities residing in Timor, and pirates from Bugis, Ende, and Sulu.  The rajah fought each other on the battlefield to decide which of them worthy of a “gift” of the war, which were women and children as merchandise for sale. Meanwhile, colonial complaints about the limited human labor to be employed in various types of work not only encouraged increased slave raiding and the purchase of slaves in distant places, but at the same time fostered slave trading activities, both were sponsored by the Dutch and Portuguese. One of the main causes of the ongoing slave trade was piracy at sea, three actors were pioneering slave raiding, namely Balanini/Ilanun, Bugis and Makassar pirate, and Ende pirate. By applying historical method, this research questioned why locals, Europeans, and pirate rulers contested to obtain slaves in Timor? The rise of capitalism was marked by the demand for cheap labor in 19th century. Therefore, slave commodities were mobilized to meet the need for labour in plantations or companies owned by the colonial government.
奴隶贸易辛迪加:19世纪帝汶地方统治者、欧洲人和海盗之间的奴隶制之争
本文分析了19世纪东帝汶奴隶制活动的争议。奴隶贸易离不开三股势力之间的斗争,即地方当局(拉贾)、居住在帝汶的殖民地实体和来自布吉斯、恩德和苏禄的海盗。王公们在战场上互相厮杀,决定谁配得上战争的“礼物”,谁是作为商品出售的妇女和儿童。与此同时,殖民地对各种工作中人力资源有限的抱怨不仅鼓励了更多的奴隶掠夺和在遥远的地方购买奴隶,同时也促进了奴隶贸易活动,这两种活动都是由荷兰人和葡萄牙人赞助的。导致奴隶贸易持续的主要原因之一是海上海盗,三个角色是奴隶掠夺的先驱,即Balanini/Ilanun, Bugis和Makassar海盗,以及Ende海盗。本研究运用历史方法,探讨为何当地人、欧洲人和海盗统治者在帝汶岛争夺奴隶?19世纪资本主义的兴起是以对廉价劳动力的需求为标志的。因此,奴隶商品被动员起来,以满足殖民地政府拥有的种植园或公司对劳动力的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信