Rule-Based Method and Deep Learning Networks for Automatic Classification of ECG

G. Bortolan, I. Christov, I. Simova
{"title":"Rule-Based Method and Deep Learning Networks for Automatic Classification of ECG","authors":"G. Bortolan, I. Christov, I. Simova","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study is to explore the potentiality of combining a classical rule-based method with a Deep Learning method for automatic classification of ECG for participation in PhysicNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2020. Six databases are considered for training set. They consist 43101 12 -leads ECG recording, lasting from 6 to 60 seconds considering 24 diagnostic classes. The rule-based method is using morphological and time-frequency ECG descriptors, characterizing each diagnostic labels. These rules have been extracted from the knowledge-base of a physician, with no direct learning procedure in the first phase, while a refinement have been tested in the second phase. The Deep Learning method consider both raw ECG signals and median beat signals. These data are processed by continuous wavelet transform analysis obtaining a time-frequency domain representtation, with the generation of specific images. These images are used for training Convolutional Neural Networks for ECG diagnostic classification. Official result of the classification accuracy of the ECGs Test set of our team named ‘Gio_Ivo’ produced a challenge validation score of 0.325 for the rule based method, and a 0.426 for the Deep learning methodology with GoogleNet, which was chosen for the final score, obtaining a full test score of 0.298, placing us 12th out of 41 in the official ranking.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The objective of the study is to explore the potentiality of combining a classical rule-based method with a Deep Learning method for automatic classification of ECG for participation in PhysicNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2020. Six databases are considered for training set. They consist 43101 12 -leads ECG recording, lasting from 6 to 60 seconds considering 24 diagnostic classes. The rule-based method is using morphological and time-frequency ECG descriptors, characterizing each diagnostic labels. These rules have been extracted from the knowledge-base of a physician, with no direct learning procedure in the first phase, while a refinement have been tested in the second phase. The Deep Learning method consider both raw ECG signals and median beat signals. These data are processed by continuous wavelet transform analysis obtaining a time-frequency domain representtation, with the generation of specific images. These images are used for training Convolutional Neural Networks for ECG diagnostic classification. Official result of the classification accuracy of the ECGs Test set of our team named ‘Gio_Ivo’ produced a challenge validation score of 0.325 for the rule based method, and a 0.426 for the Deep learning methodology with GoogleNet, which was chosen for the final score, obtaining a full test score of 0.298, placing us 12th out of 41 in the official ranking.
基于规则的心电自动分类方法和深度学习网络
该研究的目的是探索将经典的基于规则的方法与深度学习方法相结合的潜力,用于参与2020年物理网络/计算心脏病学挑战赛。训练集考虑了6个数据库。它们包括43101个12导联心电图记录,持续时间从6到60秒不等,考虑到24个诊断类别。基于规则的方法是使用形态学和时频ECG描述符,表征每个诊断标签。这些规则是从医生的知识库中提取出来的,在第一阶段没有直接的学习过程,而在第二阶段进行了改进测试。深度学习方法同时考虑原始心电信号和中值心跳信号。这些数据经过连续小波变换分析得到时频域表示,生成特定图像。这些图像用于训练卷积神经网络用于ECG诊断分类。我们团队名为“Gio_Ivo”的eeg测试集的分类准确性的官方结果显示,基于规则的方法的挑战验证分数为0.325,使用GoogleNet的深度学习方法的挑战验证分数为0.426,该方法被选为最终分数,获得0.298的完整测试分数,在41个官方排名中排名第12位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信