«Life» and «Death». An Inquiry into Essential Meaning of These Phenomena

A. Leonov
{"title":"«Life» and «Death». An Inquiry into Essential Meaning of These Phenomena","authors":"A. Leonov","doi":"10.31812/apd.v0i22.4445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I am dealing with the phenomena of «life» and «death». The questions that I attempt to answer are «What is life, and what is death?», «Is it bad to die?» and «Is there life after death?». The method that I am using in this paper is that of phenomenology. The latter I understand as an inquiry into meaning, that is, what makes this or that phenomenon as such. Thus, I am approaching the phenomena in question from the point of view of their meaning in the first place. I claim that ordinarily we constitute phenomena of «life» and «death» in a twofold way. When it comes to «life», one can specify «life-as-biological», and «life-as-a-possibility» senses. The former I understand as a cluster of biological processes that unfold in physical time. By «life-as-a-possibility», I understand a cluster of projects, potentials that depend on our subjectivity. I claim that we essentially perceive life-as-biological through life-as-a-possibility. When it comes to «death», I argue that we essentially constitute this phenomenon in a similar manner. On the one hand, we perceive «death» in the «death-as-biological/physical» sense which signifies the end of the organism’s biological processes. On the other hand, we constitute «death» as the «existential/practical death»/«death-of-possibility». By that I mean an annihilation of all possibilities, and projects. In short, it is a situation when one’s life suddenly loses all its meaning and value: death of meaning. I argue that what constitutes the significance of «death-as-biological» for us is what I call the «existential/practical death» or «death-of-possibility». I use the phenomena of mourning and suicide to illustrate my point better. Reflecting on whether it is bad to die, I claim that if we accept the hypotheses I am defending in the paper, it appears that death is bad because it entails the loss of all possibilities. I also want to show that people’s desire for immortality is in fact reasonable, because the more one lives, the more possibilities one is able to realize. In other words, people’s desire for immortality is grounded in the essential understanding of the phenomenon of «life» as a possibility. Reflecting on whether there is life after death, my answer is twofold. Since there is no scientific evidence of life after physical/biological death, I think there is no reason to believe in such as well. But when it comes to the question whether there is life after the existential/practical death, my answer is positive: «Yes, there is!» I try to show that it is always possible to find the meaning of life even in the light of the most terrible events. In this sense, there is always a light at the end of the tunnel.","PeriodicalId":305298,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми духовності","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Актуальні проблеми духовності","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i22.4445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I am dealing with the phenomena of «life» and «death». The questions that I attempt to answer are «What is life, and what is death?», «Is it bad to die?» and «Is there life after death?». The method that I am using in this paper is that of phenomenology. The latter I understand as an inquiry into meaning, that is, what makes this or that phenomenon as such. Thus, I am approaching the phenomena in question from the point of view of their meaning in the first place. I claim that ordinarily we constitute phenomena of «life» and «death» in a twofold way. When it comes to «life», one can specify «life-as-biological», and «life-as-a-possibility» senses. The former I understand as a cluster of biological processes that unfold in physical time. By «life-as-a-possibility», I understand a cluster of projects, potentials that depend on our subjectivity. I claim that we essentially perceive life-as-biological through life-as-a-possibility. When it comes to «death», I argue that we essentially constitute this phenomenon in a similar manner. On the one hand, we perceive «death» in the «death-as-biological/physical» sense which signifies the end of the organism’s biological processes. On the other hand, we constitute «death» as the «existential/practical death»/«death-of-possibility». By that I mean an annihilation of all possibilities, and projects. In short, it is a situation when one’s life suddenly loses all its meaning and value: death of meaning. I argue that what constitutes the significance of «death-as-biological» for us is what I call the «existential/practical death» or «death-of-possibility». I use the phenomena of mourning and suicide to illustrate my point better. Reflecting on whether it is bad to die, I claim that if we accept the hypotheses I am defending in the paper, it appears that death is bad because it entails the loss of all possibilities. I also want to show that people’s desire for immortality is in fact reasonable, because the more one lives, the more possibilities one is able to realize. In other words, people’s desire for immortality is grounded in the essential understanding of the phenomenon of «life» as a possibility. Reflecting on whether there is life after death, my answer is twofold. Since there is no scientific evidence of life after physical/biological death, I think there is no reason to believe in such as well. But when it comes to the question whether there is life after the existential/practical death, my answer is positive: «Yes, there is!» I try to show that it is always possible to find the meaning of life even in the light of the most terrible events. In this sense, there is always a light at the end of the tunnel.
«生»和«死»。这些现象的本质意义探析
在这篇论文中,我讨论的是“生”和“死”的现象。我试图回答的问题是“什么是生命,什么是死亡?”、“死不好吗?”和“死后还有生命吗?”我在这篇论文中使用的方法是现象学的方法。我把后者理解为对意义的探究,也就是说,是什么使这个或那个现象成为这样。因此,我首先从它们的意义的角度来探讨这些问题。我声称,通常我们以双重方式构成“生”和“死”现象。当谈到“生命”时,人们可以指定“生物生命”和“可能性生命”的感觉。我把前者理解为在物理时间中展开的一系列生物过程。通过“生命作为一种可能性”,我理解了一组项目,依赖于我们主体性的潜力。我认为我们从本质上通过生命的可能性来感知生命的生物性。当谈到“死亡”时,我认为我们本质上是以类似的方式构成这一现象。一方面,我们以“作为生物/物理的死亡”的意义来感知“死亡”,这意味着有机体生物过程的结束。另一方面,我们把“死亡”构成为“存在的/实践的死亡”/“可能性的死亡”。我的意思是所有可能性和计划的毁灭。简而言之,这是一种情况,当一个人的生活突然失去了所有的意义和价值:意义的死亡。我认为,构成“作为生物的死亡”对我们的意义的是我所说的“存在/实践的死亡”或“可能性的死亡”。我用哀悼和自杀的现象来更好地说明我的观点。在思考死亡是否坏事时,我认为,如果我们接受我在论文中捍卫的假设,死亡似乎是坏事,因为它意味着失去所有可能性。我还想表明,人们对永生的渴望实际上是合理的,因为一个人活得越久,他实现的可能性就越大。换句话说,人们对永生的渴望是建立在对“生命”现象作为一种可能性的基本理解之上的。考虑到死后是否还有生命,我的答案是双重的。既然没有科学证据表明身体/生物死亡后还有生命,我认为也没有理由相信这种说法。但当涉及到存在/实际死亡后是否还有生命的问题时,我的回答是肯定的:“是的,有!”我试图表明,即使经历了最可怕的事件,也总有可能找到生命的意义。从这个意义上说,隧道的尽头总是有光明的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信