Enteric-coated and plain naproxen tablets in osteoarthritis; tolerability and efficacy.

O F Lehn, O N Jensen, L A Andersen, K A Christensen, L Solheim, J Barslev, W Mjølstad, G Wiig, H H Ibfelt, T Kjønniksen
{"title":"Enteric-coated and plain naproxen tablets in osteoarthritis; tolerability and efficacy.","authors":"O F Lehn,&nbsp;O N Jensen,&nbsp;L A Andersen,&nbsp;K A Christensen,&nbsp;L Solheim,&nbsp;J Barslev,&nbsp;W Mjølstad,&nbsp;G Wiig,&nbsp;H H Ibfelt,&nbsp;T Kjønniksen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this 8 week study, was to compare the tolerability and efficacy of enteric-coated (ECT) and plain naproxen tablets (PT). Ninety eight patients (mean age 66 years) with osteoarthritis were included in a randomized, multi-centre, double-blind, cross-over study. Response variables were monitored at 2 week intervals for the duration of the study. Sixteen patients withdrew from the study, eight because of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (ECT 5, PT3). There was no significant difference in patients preference. Eighteen patients reported GI adverse events only on PT compared to 9 on ECT (n.s.). In the first treatment period the severity of adverse events was significantly less on ECT (P = 0.015). Both enteric-coated and plain naproxen tablets were effective and well tolerated. In conclusion, the study did not show any clinical significant difference in tolerability or efficacy between the formulations in osteoarthritis of the knee and/or the hip, although some of the variables did show statistical significant difference or tendency in favour of the enteric coated tablets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"12 2","pages":"31-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this 8 week study, was to compare the tolerability and efficacy of enteric-coated (ECT) and plain naproxen tablets (PT). Ninety eight patients (mean age 66 years) with osteoarthritis were included in a randomized, multi-centre, double-blind, cross-over study. Response variables were monitored at 2 week intervals for the duration of the study. Sixteen patients withdrew from the study, eight because of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (ECT 5, PT3). There was no significant difference in patients preference. Eighteen patients reported GI adverse events only on PT compared to 9 on ECT (n.s.). In the first treatment period the severity of adverse events was significantly less on ECT (P = 0.015). Both enteric-coated and plain naproxen tablets were effective and well tolerated. In conclusion, the study did not show any clinical significant difference in tolerability or efficacy between the formulations in osteoarthritis of the knee and/or the hip, although some of the variables did show statistical significant difference or tendency in favour of the enteric coated tablets.

肠溶萘普生片与普通萘普生片治疗骨关节炎耐受性和有效性。
这项为期8周的研究的目的是比较肠溶片(ECT)和普通萘普生片(PT)的耐受性和疗效。98例骨关节炎患者(平均年龄66岁)被纳入一项随机、多中心、双盲、交叉研究。在研究期间,每隔2周监测应答变量。16例患者退出研究,8例因胃肠道(GI)不良事件(ECT 5, PT3)。患者的偏好无显著差异。18例患者仅在PT组报告了胃肠道不良事件,而在ECT组报告了9例。在第一个治疗期,ECT组不良事件的严重程度明显低于对照组(P = 0.015)。肠溶片和普通萘普生片均有效且耐受性良好。总之,该研究没有显示两种制剂在治疗膝关节和/或髋关节骨关节炎的耐受性或疗效方面有任何临床显著差异,尽管一些变量确实显示肠包衣片剂有统计学显著差异或倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信