A study to evaluate the effectiveness of educational intervention program on knowledge regarding behavioral problems of school children among primary school teachers of selected government schools Hubballi

Saba Nadaf, Dr. Somashekarayya Kalmath, Shivappa Bannur
{"title":"A study to evaluate the effectiveness of educational intervention program on knowledge regarding behavioral problems of school children among primary school teachers of selected government schools Hubballi","authors":"Saba Nadaf, Dr. Somashekarayya Kalmath, Shivappa Bannur","doi":"10.33545/26641291.2023.v5.i1b.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Behavioural problem is often seen as less stigmatizing, less sever, more socially acceptable and more practical than the term emotionally disturbed. The term grew out of a behavioural model which process the teacher can see and describe behavioural disorder, but cannot easily describe disturbed emotions. In common usage today behavioral problems is usually attributed to less severally disturbed student whereas emotionally disturbed is reserved for the most seriously impaired. An evaluative study was conducted among 45 Primary school teachers of selected schools, Hubballi. The research design used for the present study was pre-experimental: one group pre-test, post-test design. Non-Probability, purposive sampling technique was used to select the sample. The data was collected by using structured knowledge questionnaire. Data analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistics. Overall result of the study revealed that, in the pre-test, Majority of them in the pre-test 25(55.56%) had average knowledge, 11(24.44%) had good knowledge and 9(20%) had poor knowledge. Where as in Post-test 44(97.78%) had good knowledge and 1(2.22%) had average knowledge and none of them had poor knowledge scores regarding Behavioural problem of school children. There was a significant gain in knowledge of school teachers who were exposed to the educational intervention program i.e. 25.27%. The paired ‘t’ value (t cal =17.21*) at p <0.05 level of significance for knowledge proved that the stated hypothesis i.e. the mean post-test knowledge scores of school teachers in Selected schools who were exposed to the educational intervention program will be significantly higher than the pre-test knowledge scores at 0.05 level of significance. The study concluded that Educational Intervention Program was more effective for Primary school teachers to increase and update their knowledge regarding Behavioural problems of school children.","PeriodicalId":205602,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Paediatric Nursing","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Paediatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26641291.2023.v5.i1b.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioural problem is often seen as less stigmatizing, less sever, more socially acceptable and more practical than the term emotionally disturbed. The term grew out of a behavioural model which process the teacher can see and describe behavioural disorder, but cannot easily describe disturbed emotions. In common usage today behavioral problems is usually attributed to less severally disturbed student whereas emotionally disturbed is reserved for the most seriously impaired. An evaluative study was conducted among 45 Primary school teachers of selected schools, Hubballi. The research design used for the present study was pre-experimental: one group pre-test, post-test design. Non-Probability, purposive sampling technique was used to select the sample. The data was collected by using structured knowledge questionnaire. Data analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistics. Overall result of the study revealed that, in the pre-test, Majority of them in the pre-test 25(55.56%) had average knowledge, 11(24.44%) had good knowledge and 9(20%) had poor knowledge. Where as in Post-test 44(97.78%) had good knowledge and 1(2.22%) had average knowledge and none of them had poor knowledge scores regarding Behavioural problem of school children. There was a significant gain in knowledge of school teachers who were exposed to the educational intervention program i.e. 25.27%. The paired ‘t’ value (t cal =17.21*) at p <0.05 level of significance for knowledge proved that the stated hypothesis i.e. the mean post-test knowledge scores of school teachers in Selected schools who were exposed to the educational intervention program will be significantly higher than the pre-test knowledge scores at 0.05 level of significance. The study concluded that Educational Intervention Program was more effective for Primary school teachers to increase and update their knowledge regarding Behavioural problems of school children.
教育干预方案对选定公立学校小学教师学童行为问题知识的影响研究[j]
行为问题通常被认为比“情绪紊乱”这个词不那么污名化,不那么严重,更容易被社会接受,也更实用。这个词源于一种行为模式,即教师可以看到并描述行为障碍,但不能轻易描述受干扰的情绪。在今天的普遍用法中,行为问题通常被认为是受影响较小的学生,而情绪问题则是受影响最严重的学生。本研究以Hubballi所选学校45名小学教师为对象,进行评性研究。本研究采用实验前设计:一组前测后测设计。采用非概率、有目的抽样技术选择样本。采用结构化知识问卷法收集数据。数据分析采用描述性统计和推理统计。总体研究结果显示,在前测中,前测25人(55.56%)知识一般,前测11人(24.44%)知识良好,前测9人(20%)知识较差。在后测中,有44人(97.78%)对学龄儿童的行为问题有良好的认识,1人(2.22%)有一般的认识,均无较差的认识得分。接受教育干预计划的学校教师的知识有显著增加,占25.27%。配对“t”值(t cal =17.21*)在p <0.05的知识显著性水平上证明所述假设,即接受教育干预方案的被选学校教师的测后知识平均分显著高于测前知识平均分,在0.05的显著性水平上。研究认为,教育干预计划对小学教师增加和更新学童行为问题的知识更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信