Diagnosis of Leadership Pattern in the Treatment of Functional Laziness: Sample of Samarra University

Abstract

The current research seeks to reveal the relationship and influence between leadership styles through its dimensions (autocratic style, democratic style, free style) and functional laziness. Where (52) questionnaires were distributed to the research sample, in which the higher departments were chosen from the university president, his assistants, deans, their assistants, and heads of departments, comprehensively, and the data was analyzed using statistical methods (SPSS v.26), as a number of statistical methods were used to verify the validity of the hypothesis, including Correlation coefficient (person) and simple regression analysis, where the results showed that there is a very strong correlation between some dimensions of leadership styles, while the correlation is almost non-existent with others, as the correlation coefficient for dimensions ranged between ((-0.084-1) at the level of significance (0.01). Which indicates the existence of a close and significant correlation between the variables and that it has a strong (directive) effect on leadership styles, and therefore we reject the null hypothesis, as the result came that the style A For an autocratic, its correlation coefficient was very strong and statistically significant, and the correlation was inverse with the democratic style and direct with the free style, and the effect of the autocratic style on the audience of the research sample appeared very strong, and on the basis of that, recommendations were made, including the need to highlight the concept of the characteristics of leadership styles and characterize them well, in addition to not adhering to the leadership style One.