Collective Housing As New Identity in Rural Areas

M. Arandjelović, A. Videnovic
{"title":"Collective Housing As New Identity in Rural Areas","authors":"M. Arandjelović, A. Videnovic","doi":"10.18485/arh_pt.2020.7.ch53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changes in the social and cultural pattern have led to some changes in the forms of rural housing. Especially in the post-war period, more precisely 70’s and 80’s of the twentieth century, which represents the research timeframe. One of the main reasons for this is certainly the process of post-war intensive industrialization, while the other lies in the need to improve the basic amenities and services of the settlement. The paper describes the collective housing in rural areas built in Serbia as a former republic of socialist Yugoslavia. Collective housing in the countryside appears to be a real need for working class accommodation employed in industrial plants as well as housing for government officials and workers of public institutions (post office, police, schools, etc.). The archi tecture of these buildings, on the other hand, did not possess the features of regional and traditional architectural values. It belonged to a different practice embodied in the values of socialist ideology. It should also be added that the construction of such buildings was not characteristic for all forms of rural settlements. These were predominantly rural settlements of higher category which had well established centers and other elements of urban structure as well as solid demographic potential. In this sense, the research seeks to point out some relevant specifics of such construction on the one hand, and on the other to point out some of the possibilities for future spatial and functional organization of rural settlements.","PeriodicalId":337051,"journal":{"name":"International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/arh_pt.2020.7.ch53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in the social and cultural pattern have led to some changes in the forms of rural housing. Especially in the post-war period, more precisely 70’s and 80’s of the twentieth century, which represents the research timeframe. One of the main reasons for this is certainly the process of post-war intensive industrialization, while the other lies in the need to improve the basic amenities and services of the settlement. The paper describes the collective housing in rural areas built in Serbia as a former republic of socialist Yugoslavia. Collective housing in the countryside appears to be a real need for working class accommodation employed in industrial plants as well as housing for government officials and workers of public institutions (post office, police, schools, etc.). The archi tecture of these buildings, on the other hand, did not possess the features of regional and traditional architectural values. It belonged to a different practice embodied in the values of socialist ideology. It should also be added that the construction of such buildings was not characteristic for all forms of rural settlements. These were predominantly rural settlements of higher category which had well established centers and other elements of urban structure as well as solid demographic potential. In this sense, the research seeks to point out some relevant specifics of such construction on the one hand, and on the other to point out some of the possibilities for future spatial and functional organization of rural settlements.
集体住房作为农村的新身份
社会文化格局的变化导致了农村住房形式的一些变化。特别是在战后时期,更确切地说是20世纪70年代和80年代,这代表了研究的时间框架。造成这种情况的一个主要原因当然是战后密集工业化的进程,而另一个原因则是需要改善定居点的基本便利设施和服务。本文描述了塞尔维亚作为前南斯拉夫社会主义共和国在农村地区建造的集体住房。农村的集体住房似乎是工人阶级在工厂工作的真正需要,以及政府官员和公共机构(邮局、警察、学校等)工作人员的住房。另一方面,这些建筑的建筑结构不具备地域性和传统建筑价值的特征。它属于体现在社会主义意识形态价值观念中的另一种实践。还应补充指出,这种建筑物的建造并不是所有形式的农村住区的特点。这些主要是较高级别的农村住区,具有完善的中心和其他城市结构要素以及坚实的人口潜力。在这个意义上,本研究一方面试图指出这种建设的一些相关细节,另一方面指出未来农村聚落空间和功能组织的一些可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信