10. Brazilian Farmers at a Crossroads: Biotech Industrialization of Agriculture or New Alternatives for Family Farmers?

S. Hisano, S. Altoé
{"title":"10. Brazilian Farmers at a Crossroads: Biotech Industrialization of Agriculture or New Alternatives for Family Farmers?","authors":"S. Hisano, S. Altoé","doi":"10.7560/717701-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the late 1990s, Brazil, the world’s second largest soybean producer and exporter, has emerged as an important battlefield amid the global conflict over genetically-modified organisms (GMOs). Given the fact that the majority of soybean growers in the United States and Argentina have already adopted the associated package of new technologies, European and Asian consumers, looking for non-GMO sources, are curious as to whether or not Brazilian farmers will accept this new package, whose central components are transgenic seeds and herbicides that kill most plants, except the target crop. Until recently, growing GM crops in Brazil has been prohibited due to a judicial authority that ruled in favour of the claims made by environmental and consumers’ organizations (see Pelaez and Dalto, this volume). While the federal government, both the former Cardoso administration and the current Lula administration, has not effectively mapped out its policy either against or in favour of GMOs, the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), the southernmost state, has been implementing its “GM-free zone” policy since 1998. Two other southern states, Paraná and Santa Catarina, have also rejected GMOs. It is in Rio Grande do Sul (RS), however, where the most contentious problem has occurred: namely the smuggling of GM soybean seeds across the border with Argentina. In spite of the states’ policy banning GMO planting, many farmers, ranging from small to large scale, have grown and harvested illegal GM soybeans for years with mixed feelings: the expectation of financial benefits on the one hand, and anxiety about negative environmental and health impacts as well as about breaking the law on the other. This kind of farmers’ dilemma is our starting point. But the objective of this chapter is not to discuss GMO politics itself, which is already dealt with in other chapters","PeriodicalId":326512,"journal":{"name":"Food for the Few","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food for the Few","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/717701-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, Brazil, the world’s second largest soybean producer and exporter, has emerged as an important battlefield amid the global conflict over genetically-modified organisms (GMOs). Given the fact that the majority of soybean growers in the United States and Argentina have already adopted the associated package of new technologies, European and Asian consumers, looking for non-GMO sources, are curious as to whether or not Brazilian farmers will accept this new package, whose central components are transgenic seeds and herbicides that kill most plants, except the target crop. Until recently, growing GM crops in Brazil has been prohibited due to a judicial authority that ruled in favour of the claims made by environmental and consumers’ organizations (see Pelaez and Dalto, this volume). While the federal government, both the former Cardoso administration and the current Lula administration, has not effectively mapped out its policy either against or in favour of GMOs, the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), the southernmost state, has been implementing its “GM-free zone” policy since 1998. Two other southern states, Paraná and Santa Catarina, have also rejected GMOs. It is in Rio Grande do Sul (RS), however, where the most contentious problem has occurred: namely the smuggling of GM soybean seeds across the border with Argentina. In spite of the states’ policy banning GMO planting, many farmers, ranging from small to large scale, have grown and harvested illegal GM soybeans for years with mixed feelings: the expectation of financial benefits on the one hand, and anxiety about negative environmental and health impacts as well as about breaking the law on the other. This kind of farmers’ dilemma is our starting point. But the objective of this chapter is not to discuss GMO politics itself, which is already dealt with in other chapters
10. 十字路口的巴西农民:农业的生物技术产业化还是家庭农民的新选择?
巴西是世界第二大大豆生产国和出口国,自上世纪90年代末以来,巴西就成为全球转基因生物(gmo)冲突的重要战场。鉴于美国和阿根廷的大多数大豆种植者已经采用了相关的一揽子新技术,寻找非转基因来源的欧洲和亚洲消费者很好奇巴西农民是否会接受这一一揽子新技术,其核心成分是转基因种子和除草剂,除目标作物外,这些除草剂会杀死大多数植物。直到最近,由于司法当局支持环境和消费者组织提出的主张,巴西一直禁止种植转基因作物(见Pelaez和Dalto,本卷)。虽然联邦政府,无论是前卡多佐政府还是现任卢拉政府,都没有有效地制定出反对或支持转基因生物的政策,但最南端的南里奥格兰德州(RS)自1998年以来一直在实施其“无转基因区”政策。另外两个南方州,帕拉纳州和圣卡塔琳娜州也拒绝转基因生物。然而,最具争议的问题发生在南里奥格兰德州(Rio Grande do Sul, RS):即与阿根廷接壤的转基因大豆种子走私。尽管各州的政策禁止种植转基因作物,但许多农民,无论规模大小,多年来都怀着复杂的心情种植和收获非法转基因大豆:一方面期望获得经济利益,另一方面担心对环境和健康的负面影响以及违反法律。这种农民的困境是我们的出发点。但本章的目的不是讨论转基因政治本身,这已经在其他章节中讨论过了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信