Comparative study of a CRLH TL based Zeroth Order Resonant antenna

K. L. Sheeja, P. K. Sahu, S. Behera
{"title":"Comparative study of a CRLH TL based Zeroth Order Resonant antenna","authors":"K. L. Sheeja, P. K. Sahu, S. Behera","doi":"10.1109/NCC.2012.6176828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparative study between a compact microstrip Zeroth Order Resonant antenna with another coplanar waveguide (CPW) based vialess ZOR antenna is presented. But the drawback of this microstrip based CRLH TL is that a narrow bandwidth of about 0.75% with an improved gain of about 3.6256dB is achieved. In order to circumvent this drawback we demonstrate a vialess CPW fed structure using the same substrate, RT Duroid (5880) (εR = 2.2, h = 1.57mm) and compare the performance of both these antennas. In the CPW fed case we obtain a bandwidth enhancement of about 7.84% with a dumb-bell shaped radiation pattern at phi=90deg (E-radiation pattern). The zeroth order mode obtained in this case is at 2.14GHz while with the microstrip based ZOR antenna, the zeroth order freq is at 3.995GHz with a monopolar radiation pattern at phi=90deg. The CPW fed antenna is easy to fabricate as it is based on a single layer. The drawback of this CPW fed antenna is that the gain reduces to 1.6949dB as the structure is electrically much smaller than the microstrip based ZOR antenna. Simulated results for both the cases are shown. The operational bandwidth of the CPW based ZOR antenna at 2.14 (2.06 to 2.2195) GHz covers the required bandwidths of the IEEE 802.11 for wireless local-area networks (WLAN) applications while in case of the microstrip ZOR antenna, the operational bandwidth at 3.995Ghz and at 3.095 GHz encompasses worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WiMax) standards suitable for point to point multiband applications.","PeriodicalId":178278,"journal":{"name":"2012 National Conference on Communications (NCC)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 National Conference on Communications (NCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCC.2012.6176828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper, a comparative study between a compact microstrip Zeroth Order Resonant antenna with another coplanar waveguide (CPW) based vialess ZOR antenna is presented. But the drawback of this microstrip based CRLH TL is that a narrow bandwidth of about 0.75% with an improved gain of about 3.6256dB is achieved. In order to circumvent this drawback we demonstrate a vialess CPW fed structure using the same substrate, RT Duroid (5880) (εR = 2.2, h = 1.57mm) and compare the performance of both these antennas. In the CPW fed case we obtain a bandwidth enhancement of about 7.84% with a dumb-bell shaped radiation pattern at phi=90deg (E-radiation pattern). The zeroth order mode obtained in this case is at 2.14GHz while with the microstrip based ZOR antenna, the zeroth order freq is at 3.995GHz with a monopolar radiation pattern at phi=90deg. The CPW fed antenna is easy to fabricate as it is based on a single layer. The drawback of this CPW fed antenna is that the gain reduces to 1.6949dB as the structure is electrically much smaller than the microstrip based ZOR antenna. Simulated results for both the cases are shown. The operational bandwidth of the CPW based ZOR antenna at 2.14 (2.06 to 2.2195) GHz covers the required bandwidths of the IEEE 802.11 for wireless local-area networks (WLAN) applications while in case of the microstrip ZOR antenna, the operational bandwidth at 3.995Ghz and at 3.095 GHz encompasses worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WiMax) standards suitable for point to point multiband applications.
基于CRLH TL的零阶谐振天线的比较研究
本文对紧凑型微带零阶谐振天线与另一种基于共面波导(CPW)的无腔ZOR天线进行了比较研究。但是这种基于微带的CRLH TL的缺点是实现了约0.75%的窄带宽和约3.6256dB的增益改进。为了克服这一缺点,我们展示了使用相同衬底的无极CPW馈电结构,RT durid (5880) (εR = 2.2, h = 1.57mm),并比较了这两种天线的性能。在CPW馈电情况下,我们获得了约7.84%的带宽增强,在phi=90度处出现哑铃形辐射图(e辐射图)。在这种情况下获得的零阶模式为2.14GHz,而基于微带的ZOR天线的零阶频率为3.995GHz,其单极辐射方向图为phi=90°。CPW馈电天线由于是基于单层结构,易于制造。这种CPW馈电天线的缺点是增益降低到1.6949dB,因为该结构的电性比基于微带的ZOR天线小得多。给出了两种情况下的仿真结果。基于CPW的ZOR天线的2.14(2.06至2.2195)GHz的工作带宽涵盖了无线局域网(WLAN)应用所需的IEEE 802.11带宽,而在微带ZOR天线的情况下,3.995Ghz和3.095 GHz的工作带宽涵盖了适用于点对点多频段应用的微波接入(WiMax)标准的全球互操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信