As razões do poder material e do poder normativo na política internacional: o caso de Timor-Leste

Pedro Emanuel Mendes
{"title":"As razões do poder material e do poder normativo na política internacional: o caso de Timor-Leste","authors":"Pedro Emanuel Mendes","doi":"10.23906/ri2022.74a02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes a theorization on the dynamics of material power and normative power reasons in international politics to explain the East Timorese question. The article compares two decisive moments, firstly, the initial phase of the Indonesian annexation and the birth of the international question of Timor; secondly, the final phase of its resolution and the birth of the East Timor state, supported by the United Nations (UN), Portugal, and other actors. The article shows that, in 1975, the actors did not consider the normative reasons. On the contrary, from 1999 onwards, actors were socialized to consider the illegitimacy of the Indonesian annexation and to decide following international norms.","PeriodicalId":351727,"journal":{"name":"Relações Internacionais","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relações Internacionais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23906/ri2022.74a02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article proposes a theorization on the dynamics of material power and normative power reasons in international politics to explain the East Timorese question. The article compares two decisive moments, firstly, the initial phase of the Indonesian annexation and the birth of the international question of Timor; secondly, the final phase of its resolution and the birth of the East Timor state, supported by the United Nations (UN), Portugal, and other actors. The article shows that, in 1975, the actors did not consider the normative reasons. On the contrary, from 1999 onwards, actors were socialized to consider the illegitimacy of the Indonesian annexation and to decide following international norms.
国际政治中物质权力和规范权力的原因:以东帝汶为例
本文从国际政治中的物质权力和规范性权力动因的动态出发,提出了一种解释东帝汶问题的理论。本文比较了两个决定性的时刻,一是印度尼西亚吞并的初始阶段和帝汶国际问题的产生;第二,在联合国、葡萄牙和其他行动者的支持下,决议的最后阶段和东帝汶国家的诞生。文章表明,在1975年,行为人没有考虑规范性的原因。相反,从1999年起,行为者被社会化,考虑印度尼西亚吞并的非法性,并按照国际准则作出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信