Oral contraceptives: an epidemiological perspective.

International Journal of Fertility Pub Date : 1992-01-01
Y Tayob
{"title":"Oral contraceptives: an epidemiological perspective.","authors":"Y Tayob","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral contraceptives (OCs) containing a fixed dose of estrogen and progestogen in a 21-day regimen initially were approved for unrestricted use in the 1960s in the United States. OCs have been used and studied extensively for more than 30 years. They have always been seen as providing excellent efficacy. However, estrogens were associated with major risks in the use of OCs. In the early 1960s, case reports of thromboembolism in women using OCs led to epidemiological studies suggesting a correlation between deep vein thrombosis and the estrogen content of the pill. Research focused on decreasing the estrogen dose. In the evolution process, the combination monophasics of the early 1960s gave way to the sequential pill and the \"mini pill\" of the 1970s. Sex steroids given in the form of OCs were shown to alter lipoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism. This, together with the increased risk of thromboembolism, led to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, e.g., myocardial infarction. Little consideration (in the early 1960s) was given to the effects of potent progestogens and their interaction with estrogens. Hence, the recent focus of clinical research is the development of new and improved progestational agents. These third-generation gonane types appear to have little impact on carbohydrate or lipoprotein metabolism while maintaining excellent efficacy and cycle control. They should reduce the risk of serious side effects. However, to understand how and why these agents evolved, tracing the history of OC development is valuable. It might allow us to determine the baseline dose where we will begin to lose some of the OCs' benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":13990,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility","volume":"37 Suppl 4 ","pages":"199-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral contraceptives (OCs) containing a fixed dose of estrogen and progestogen in a 21-day regimen initially were approved for unrestricted use in the 1960s in the United States. OCs have been used and studied extensively for more than 30 years. They have always been seen as providing excellent efficacy. However, estrogens were associated with major risks in the use of OCs. In the early 1960s, case reports of thromboembolism in women using OCs led to epidemiological studies suggesting a correlation between deep vein thrombosis and the estrogen content of the pill. Research focused on decreasing the estrogen dose. In the evolution process, the combination monophasics of the early 1960s gave way to the sequential pill and the "mini pill" of the 1970s. Sex steroids given in the form of OCs were shown to alter lipoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism. This, together with the increased risk of thromboembolism, led to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, e.g., myocardial infarction. Little consideration (in the early 1960s) was given to the effects of potent progestogens and their interaction with estrogens. Hence, the recent focus of clinical research is the development of new and improved progestational agents. These third-generation gonane types appear to have little impact on carbohydrate or lipoprotein metabolism while maintaining excellent efficacy and cycle control. They should reduce the risk of serious side effects. However, to understand how and why these agents evolved, tracing the history of OC development is valuable. It might allow us to determine the baseline dose where we will begin to lose some of the OCs' benefits.

口服避孕药:流行病学观点。
口服避孕药(OCs)含有固定剂量的雌激素和孕激素,为期21天,最初于20世纪60年代在美国被批准无限制使用。OCs已被广泛应用和研究了30多年。它们一直被认为具有极佳的功效。然而,雌激素与使用OCs的主要风险相关。在20世纪60年代早期,使用避孕药的女性发生血栓栓塞的病例报告导致流行病学研究表明深静脉血栓形成与避孕药雌激素含量之间存在相关性。研究的重点是降低雌激素的剂量。在进化过程中,20世纪60年代早期的组合单相药让位于20世纪70年代的连续药丸和“迷你药丸”。以OCs形式给予的性类固醇被证明可以改变脂蛋白和碳水化合物代谢。这与血栓栓塞的风险增加一起,导致心血管疾病(如心肌梗死)的风险增加。在20世纪60年代早期,人们很少考虑到强效孕激素的作用及其与雌激素的相互作用。因此,最近临床研究的重点是开发新的和改进的孕药。这些第三代甾烷类型似乎对碳水化合物或脂蛋白代谢影响不大,但保持了良好的疗效和周期控制。它们可以减少严重副作用的风险。然而,要了解这些因子是如何以及为什么进化的,追踪OC的发展历史是有价值的。它可以让我们确定基线剂量,我们将开始失去一些OCs的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信