Change Is Possible: The Law As A Barrier And A Tool

Marianne Møllmann
{"title":"Change Is Possible: The Law As A Barrier And A Tool","authors":"Marianne Møllmann","doi":"10.31641/CLR150211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a central principle for me that change is possible, and that law helps make it happen. However, as advocates and legal advisors for women’s rights, we are constantly forced to confront the limits of the law as a tool for change. Today I will explore where and why the law is not enough, and look at what we can do to move beyond the law and effectively generate the change we want to see. The truth of the matter is that the law can be very inadequate when it comes to the protection of reproductive rights. One example of this includes laws that impose punitive measures on drug use during pregnancy. Last year, Amnesty International worked on a case in Norway involving a woman who is a recovering opiate user.1 The woman was in opiate substitution therapy, which is entirely legal in Norway. She was not under the Norwegian government program, and it is also entirely legal in Norway to be on a privately sponsored opiate substitution program. She was getting her prescription drugs in Belgium, and that is also entirely legal as long as you are under medical supervision, which this woman was. At the same time, Norway’s social services law empowers the state to take anybody into its custody if it feels the person is in imminent danger of doing damage to herself or to a third person, including an unborn child.2 There is no appeals procedure and there is also no definition of risk levels required or of what kind of danger a person must be in for the state to take custody of her. In fact, there is not even a definition of the substance use that could","PeriodicalId":220741,"journal":{"name":"City University of New York Law Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City University of New York Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31641/CLR150211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is a central principle for me that change is possible, and that law helps make it happen. However, as advocates and legal advisors for women’s rights, we are constantly forced to confront the limits of the law as a tool for change. Today I will explore where and why the law is not enough, and look at what we can do to move beyond the law and effectively generate the change we want to see. The truth of the matter is that the law can be very inadequate when it comes to the protection of reproductive rights. One example of this includes laws that impose punitive measures on drug use during pregnancy. Last year, Amnesty International worked on a case in Norway involving a woman who is a recovering opiate user.1 The woman was in opiate substitution therapy, which is entirely legal in Norway. She was not under the Norwegian government program, and it is also entirely legal in Norway to be on a privately sponsored opiate substitution program. She was getting her prescription drugs in Belgium, and that is also entirely legal as long as you are under medical supervision, which this woman was. At the same time, Norway’s social services law empowers the state to take anybody into its custody if it feels the person is in imminent danger of doing damage to herself or to a third person, including an unborn child.2 There is no appeals procedure and there is also no definition of risk levels required or of what kind of danger a person must be in for the state to take custody of her. In fact, there is not even a definition of the substance use that could
改变是可能的:法律既是障碍又是工具
对我来说,改变是可能的,法律帮助改变发生,这是我的核心原则。然而,作为妇女权利的倡导者和法律顾问,我们经常被迫面对法律作为变革工具的局限性。今天,我将探讨法律在哪些方面以及为什么不够,并看看我们能做些什么来超越法律,有效地产生我们想要看到的变化。问题的真相是,在保护生育权利方面,法律可能非常不充分。这方面的一个例子包括对怀孕期间吸毒采取惩罚性措施的法律。去年,国际特赦组织在挪威处理了一起案件,涉及一名正在戒毒的妇女这名妇女正在接受阿片替代疗法,这在挪威是完全合法的。她不在挪威政府的计划之内,而且在挪威,参加私人赞助的鸦片替代计划是完全合法的。她是在比利时拿到处方药的,只要你在医疗监督下,这也是完全合法的,而这个女人就是。与此同时,挪威的社会服务法赋予国家权力,如果它认为任何人有可能对自己或第三人(包括未出生的孩子)造成伤害,就可以将其拘留没有上诉程序,也没有规定所要求的风险等级,也没有规定一个人必须处于何种危险状态,国家才能对她进行监护。事实上,甚至没有一个物质使用的定义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信